Weed growth and labor demand under hand-hoe based reduced tillage in smallholder farmers’ fields in Zimbabwe
Open accessAbstract
Conservation agriculture based on hand hoe dug planting basins has been widely promoted for the last decade or two in the smallholder farming sector of southern Africa targeting resource constrained households without access to draft power. In Zimbabwe planting basins are used by about one hundred thousand households but on small plots (<0.5ha) although most are unable to adopt soil surface mulching and crop rotation due to competing uses for crop residues as livestock feed and poorly developed markets for other crops, respectively. We report on the effects of reduced tillage based on hand-hoe dug planting basins (PB) on weed growth (20 farms), and labor demand and returns to investment (50 farms) compared with animal-drawn mouldboard plough based conventional tillage (CONV) in maize (Zea mays L.) fields, across selected districts located in contrasting agro-ecological zones in Zimbabwe. Weed growth was assessed through a survey conducted at the end of the 2009/10 and 2010/11 cropping seasons. Labor demand and returns to investment were measured on 50 farms across five districts using direct observations during the 2011/12 cropping season. The survey showed that farmers on average weeded their PB plots 2.7 times per season compared to 1.7–1.9 times in CONV plots (P<0.001), and timing was often delayed in the former. Reduced tillage plots had 17% (P<0.001) more weed ground cover and 9% (P<0.05) more weed dry matter compared with CONV plots in the 2009/10 season, and differences in 2010/11 were not significant. Weed growth was highest in semi-arid areas (natural regions III and IV) compared with wetter sub-humid areas (natural region II) and arid areas (natural region V). Farmers planted their PB plots 12–23 days earlier, weeding frequency was 42.1–58.9% higher in PB plots, compared with CONV. Labor demand was more than double under PB (84.7mandaysha−1, weeding 48.1mandaysha−1) compared to CONV (38.6mandaysha−1). However, returns to investment were 42.7% higher under PB (U$1.77) compared with CONV (U$1.24). Weed growth and labor demand remained high under PB tillage even after several years, interventions such as the use of alternative weed control methods need to be introduced to farmers to reduce labor demand and consequently increase its adoption both in terms of number of farmers and cultivated area in southern Africa.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Zimbabwe, hand-hoe planting basins compared to conventional tillage resulted in higher revenue (441 US$ over 273 US$) and higher yields (1603 kg over 991 kg).
“in Zimbabwe, the hand-hoe planting basins compared to conventional tillage resulted in higher revenue (441 US$ over 273 US$) and higher yields (1603 kg over 991 kg) (Nyamangara et al. 2014).”
From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Nyamangara et al. 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research.
Cox, D. F., Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, A. A. (1985) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287932 · Cited by 18,084 · see citing works
Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research.
Freeman, G. H., Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, A. A. (1985) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530673 · Cited by 3,142 · see citing works
Mazvimavi, K., & Twomlow, S. J. (2009) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2009.02.002 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Self-citationTillage Effects on Weed Seed Return and Seedbank Composition
Clements, D. R., Benoît, D. L., Murphy, S. D., et al. (1996) · Weed Science · doi:10.1017/s0043174500093942 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Zeller, M. (1998) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-5150(98)00027-9 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
An Agricultural Survey of Southern Rhodesia. Part I. Agro-Ecological Survey
Hanson, H. C., Vincent, V., & Thomas, R. (1962) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3894770 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Tailoring Conservation Agriculture to the Needs of Small Farmers in Developing Countries
Wall, P. (2007) · Journal of Crop Improvement · doi:10.1300/j411v19n01_07 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Tillage system effects on weed ecology, herbicide activity and persistence: a review
Chauhan, B. S., Gill, G., & Preston, C. D. (2006) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea05291 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Ngwira, A. R., Thierfelder, C., & Lambert, D. M. (2012) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170512000257 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
CONSERVATION FARMING IN ZAMBIA
Haggblade, S., & Tembo, G. (2003) · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.16064 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Micro-dosing as a pathway to Africa’s Green Revolution: evidence from broad-scale on-farm trials
Twomlow, S. J., Rohrbach, D., Dimes, J., et al. (2008) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-008-9200-4 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Effects of tillage and irrigation in cereal fields on weed seed removal by seed predators
Baraibar, B., Westerman, P. R., Carrión, E., et al. (2009) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01614.x · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Crop yield and weed growth under conservation agriculture in semi-arid Zimbabwe
Mashingaidze, N., Madakadze, C., Twomlow, S., Nyamangara, J., & Hove, L. (2012) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.05.008 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationConservation agriculture in Zambia : a case study of southern province
Baudron, F., Mwanza, H. M., Triomphe, B., & Bwalya, M. (2007) · Agritrop (Cirad) · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Lessons from the field - Zimbabwe's Conservation Agriculture Task Force
Twomlow, S., Urolov, J. C., Jenrich, M., et al. (2008) · Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Milgroom, J., & Giller, K. E. (2013) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.002 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Nyamangara, J., Masvaya, E. N., Tirivavi, R., et al. (2012) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.07.018 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationImproving weed management and crop productivity in maize systems in Zimbabwe
Mashingaidze, A. B. (2004) · doi:10.18174/22637 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Dryland Farming in Southern Africa
Twomlow, S., Steyn, J. T., & du Preez, C. C. (2006) · Agronomy monograph/Agronomy · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr23.2ed.c19 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Weeds in single-crop conservation farming in Zimbabwe
Vogel, H. (1994) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/0167-1987(94)90078-7 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
The influences of cropping system on weed communities of rice in Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa
Kent, R., Johnson, D. E., & Becker, M. (2001) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00153-0 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Weed management in conservation tillage systems
Lloyd, R. W. (1989) · ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Bishop-Sambrook, C., Fao, R. A. S. S. D. E., & Ifad, R. E. (2003) · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Water and nitrogen management for risk mitigation in semi-arid croping systems
Mupangwa, W. (2008) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Solving Africa's weed problem: increasing crop production & improving the lives of women.
Gianessi, L., Bruce, T. J. A., Foyer, C. H., et al. (2009) · Aspects of applied biology · Cited by 17 · see citing works
An assessment of the sustainable uptake of conservation farming in Zimbabwe
Mazvimavi, K., Twomlow, S., Belder, P., & Hove, L. (2008) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationRambakudzibga, A. M., Makanganise, A., & Mangosho, E. (2002) · African Crop Science Journal · doi:10.4314/acsj.v10i2.27548 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Mashingaidze, N. (2013) · UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationBruce, T. J. A., Foyer, C. H., Halford, N. G., et al. (2009) · Aspects of applied biology · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., 2011. Conservation agriculture: principles, sustainable land management and ecosystem services. In: Proceedings of the 40th National Con- vention of the Italian Agronomy Society, Teramo, Italy.
- Mabasa, S., Riches, C., Nyahunzvi, S., Twomlow, S., Dhliwayo, H., Chatizwa, I., 1998. Tillage and weed control responses on a semi-arid granitic catena. II. Weed responses. In: CIMMYT 6th Regional Maize Conference for Eastern and Southern Africa, Addis Ababa.
- Nhemachena, C., Murwira, H.K., Mutiro, K., Chivenge, P., 2003. A Socio-economic Analysis of Legume Production Motives and Productivity Variations Among Smallholder Farmers of Shurugwi Communal Area, Zimbabwe. CIMMYT, pp. 223.
- VSN, 2011. GenStat for Windows, 14th edition. VSN International, Hemel Hemp- stead, UK.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review
Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“For example, in Zimbabwe, the hand-hoe planting basins compared to conventional tillage resulted in higher revenue (441 US$ over 273 US$) and higher yields (1603 kg over 991 kg) (Nyamangara et al. 2014).”
BackgroundAubron, C., Noël, L., & Lasseur, J. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.013 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nyamangara, J., Mashingaidze, N., Masvaya, E. N., Nyengerai, K., Kunzekweguta, M., Tirivavi, R., & Mazvimavi, K.
- Affiliations
- International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ML)
- Corresponding author
- Nyamangara, Justice
- Venue
- Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 187
- Pages
- 146-154
- ISSN
- 0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054783604
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
- Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- conservation agriculture, reduced tillage, weed growth, returns to investment, maize, conventional tillage, moldboard plow, smallholder farmers, Zimbabwe, crop residue management, weed dry matter, sowing date, crop rotation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
