Cited by 185Agricultural Innovations and PracticesLivestock Farming and ManagementSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Adoption and development of integrated crop–livestock–forestry systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil

Gil, Juliana, Siebold, Matthias, Berger, Thomas·2015·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

By combining crop, livestock and/or forestry activities in the same area, integrated systems (IS) can increase organic matter content in the soil – which favors biomass production and allows for higher livestock stocking rates in pasturelands. The implementation of IS is therefore seen as a promising strategy for sustainable agricultural intensification in Brazil, particularly in Mato Grosso state (MT). However, despite the benefits associated with IS and incentives offered by the federal government to stimulate their dissemination, little is known about these systems or the challenges to implement them, and only a limited number of farmers have adopted IS so far. This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of all IS identified in Mato Grosso by 2012/13, which were mapped and described in terms of their main technical and non-technical features. These findings were combined with farm survey data set to provide a detailed account of the various technologies currently being disseminated, their individual diffusion levels and potential adoption constraints. Results generated through qualitative and quantitative research methods give an overview of IS’ state of the art, reveal farmer perception of such technology and offer insights into the prospects for low-carbon agriculture in the region. The study’s major findings are that IS are present in more than 40 of the 141 municipalities of MT, and the vast majority (89%) involve only crop and livestock. Farmers have adopted three different crop–livestock configurations, depending on their production strategy. Cultural aspects play a major role in farmer decisions to adopt IS, credit provision has not been relevant for IS adoption, and a broader dissemination of IS may occur as land transitions continue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The four types of system integration can be successfully adopted methodically or comprehensively in Nigeria based on location specifics and availability of funds.

    “As tested in Brazil, this paper agrees that the four types of system integration can be successfully adopted methodically or comprehensively in Nigeria based on location specifics and availability of funds.”
  • Existing attempts at cattle intensification via pasture recuperation and crop integration throughout Brazil have been held back, in part, by a failure to appreciate the importance of cultural barriers and create knowledge systems that effectively communicate the financial viability and technical specifications of these systems.

    “Existing attempts at cattle intensification via pasture recuperation and crop integration throughout Brazil have been held back, in part, by a failure to appreciate the importance of cultural barriers and create knowledge systems that effectively communicate the financial viability and technical specifications of these systems (Gil et al. 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gil, J., Siebold, M., & Berger, T.
Affiliations
University of Hohenheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Gil, Juliana
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
199
Pages
394-406
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976379822
Cited by
185
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
38.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fiat Panis Foundation
  • CarBioCial project of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems, technology adoption, technology diffusion, Mato Grosso, sustainable intensification, low-carbon agriculture, soil organic matter, farmer perceptions, credit provision, mixed farming, agroforestry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review