Adoption and development of integrated crop–livestock–forestry systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil
Abstract
By combining crop, livestock and/or forestry activities in the same area, integrated systems (IS) can increase organic matter content in the soil – which favors biomass production and allows for higher livestock stocking rates in pasturelands. The implementation of IS is therefore seen as a promising strategy for sustainable agricultural intensification in Brazil, particularly in Mato Grosso state (MT). However, despite the benefits associated with IS and incentives offered by the federal government to stimulate their dissemination, little is known about these systems or the challenges to implement them, and only a limited number of farmers have adopted IS so far. This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of all IS identified in Mato Grosso by 2012/13, which were mapped and described in terms of their main technical and non-technical features. These findings were combined with farm survey data set to provide a detailed account of the various technologies currently being disseminated, their individual diffusion levels and potential adoption constraints. Results generated through qualitative and quantitative research methods give an overview of IS’ state of the art, reveal farmer perception of such technology and offer insights into the prospects for low-carbon agriculture in the region. The study’s major findings are that IS are present in more than 40 of the 141 municipalities of MT, and the vast majority (89%) involve only crop and livestock. Farmers have adopted three different crop–livestock configurations, depending on their production strategy. Cultural aspects play a major role in farmer decisions to adopt IS, credit provision has not been relevant for IS adoption, and a broader dissemination of IS may occur as land transitions continue.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The four types of system integration can be successfully adopted methodically or comprehensively in Nigeria based on location specifics and availability of funds.
“As tested in Brazil, this paper agrees that the four types of system integration can be successfully adopted methodically or comprehensively in Nigeria based on location specifics and availability of funds.”
From Climate Change, Security, and the Resource Nexus: Case Study of Northern Nigeria and Lake Chad (2021) · cites this paper as [55]
Existing attempts at cattle intensification via pasture recuperation and crop integration throughout Brazil have been held back, in part, by a failure to appreciate the importance of cultural barriers and create knowledge systems that effectively communicate the financial viability and technical specifications of these systems.
“Existing attempts at cattle intensification via pasture recuperation and crop integration throughout Brazil have been held back, in part, by a failure to appreciate the importance of cultural barriers and create knowledge systems that effectively communicate the financial viability and technical specifications of these systems (Gil et al. 2015).”
From Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon (2017) · cites this paper as Gil et al. 2015
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Garrett, R. D., Gardner, T. A., Morello, T. F., Marchand, S., Barlow, J., Ezzine de Blas, D., Ferreira, J., Lees, A. C., & Parry, L. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09364-220327 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Climate Change, Security, and the Resource Nexus: Case Study of Northern Nigeria and Lake Chad
Wakdok, S. S., & Bleischwitz, R. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131910734 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Carvalho, R., Rausch, L., Munger, J., & Gibbs, H. K. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10101098 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gil, J., Siebold, M., & Berger, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Hohenheim (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gil, Juliana
- Venue
- Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 199
- Pages
- 394-406
- ISSN
- 0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976379822
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 38.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fiat Panis Foundation
- CarBioCial project of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems, technology adoption, technology diffusion, Mato Grosso, sustainable intensification, low-carbon agriculture, soil organic matter, farmer perceptions, credit provision, mixed farming, agroforestry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review