Critical review of the impacts of grazing intensity on soil organic carbon storage and other soil quality indicators in extensively managed grasslands
Open accessAbstract
Livestock grazing intensity (GI) is thought to have a major impact on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and soil quality indicators in grassland agroecosystems. To critically investigate this, we conducted a global review and meta-analysis of 83 studies of extensive grazing, covering 164 sites across different countries and climatic zones. Unlike previous published reviews we normalized the SOC and total nitrogen (TN) data to a 30 cm depth to be compatible with IPCC guidelines. We also calculated a normalized GI and divided the data into four main groups depending on the regional climate (dry warm, DW; dry cool, DC; moist warm, MW; moist cool, MC). Our results show that taken across all climatic zones and GIs, grazing (below the carrying capacity of the systems) results in a decrease in SOC storage, although its impact on SOC is climate-dependent. When assessed for different regional climates, all GI levels increased SOC stocks under the MW climate (+7.6%) whilst there were reductions under the MC climate (-19%). Under the DW and DC climates, only the low (+5.8%) and low to medium (+16.1%) grazing intensities, respectively, were associated with increased SOC stocks. High GI significantly increased SOC for C4-dominated grassland compared to C3-dominated grassland and C3-C4 mixed grasslands. It was also associated with significant increases in TN and bulk density but had no effect on soil pH. To protect grassland soils from degradation, we recommend that GI and management practices should be optimized according to climate region and grassland type (C3, C4 or C3-C4 mixed).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · see citing works
Ecology of a Grazing Ecosystem: The Serengeti
McNaughton, S. J. (1985) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942578 · Cited by 1,394 · see citing works
GRASSLAND MANAGEMENT AND CONVERSION INTO GRASSLAND: EFFECTS ON SOIL CARBON
Conant, R. T., Paustian, K., & Elliott, E. T. (2001) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0343:gmacig]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
Full accounting of the greenhouse gas (CO2, N2O, CH4) budget of nine European grassland sites
Soussana, J. F., Allard, V., Pilegaard, K., Ambus, P., Amman, C., Campbell, C., Ceschia, E., Clifton-Brown, J., Czobel, S., Domingues, R., et al. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.022 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Cheng, K., Yue, Q., Chadwick, D., Espenberg, M., Truu, J., Rees, R. M., & Smith, P. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14644 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
Self-citationBrewer, K. M., & Gaudin, A. C. M. (2020) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107936 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Apfelbaum, S. I., Thompson, R., Wang, F., Mosier, S., Teague, R., & Byck, P. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114576 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Schoof, N., & Luick, R. (2018) · Oxford Bibliographies in Ecology · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0207 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Chadwick, D. R., Jones, D. L., Evans, C. D., Jones, M. B., Rees, R. M., & Smith, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Bangor University (GB)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Scotland's Rural College (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Abdalla, M.
- Venue
- Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 253
- Pages
- 62-81
- ISSN
- 0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5727677
- OpenAlex
- W2767465546
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 16
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Newton Fund via UK BBSRC/NERC
- U-GRASS (NE/M016900/1)
- Soils-R-GGREAT (NE/P019455/1)
- ADVENT (NE/M019713/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- grazing intensity, soil organic carbon, soil quality, extensive grassland management, livestock grazing, soil total nitrogen, soil bulk density, soil pH, climate zones, soil carbon stocks, soil degradation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review