Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 548

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of SVM, ELM and four tree-based ensemble models for predicting daily reference evapotranspiration using limited meteorological data in different climates of China

Fan, Junliang, Yue, Wenjun, Wu, Lifeng, Zhang, Fucang, Cai, Huanjie, Wang, Xiukang, Lu, Xianghui, Xiang, Youzhen·2018·Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Abstract

Abstract Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is of great importance for the regional water resources planning and irrigation scheduling design. The FAO-56 Penman-Monteith model is recommended as the reference model to predict ET0, but its application is commonly restricted by lack of complete meteorological data at many worldwide locations. This study evaluated the potential of machine learning models, particularly four relatively simple tree-based assemble algorithms (i.e. random forest (RF), M5 model tree (M5Tree), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)), for estimating daily ET0 with limited meteorological data using a K-fold cross-validation method. For assessment of the tree-based models in terms of prediction accuracy, stability and computational costs, these models were further compared with their corresponding support vector machine (SVM) and extreme learning machine (ELM) models. Four input combinations of daily maximum and maximum temperature (Tmax and Tmin), relative humidity (Hr), wind speed (U2), global and extra-terrestrial solar radiation (Rs and Ra) with Tmax, Tmin and Ra as the base dataset were considered using meteorological data during 1961–2010 from eight representative weather stations in different climates of China. The results showed that, when lack of complete meteorological data, the machine learning models using Tmax, Tmin, Hr, U2 and Ra obtained satisfactory ET0 estimates in the temperate continental, mountain plateau and temperate monsoon zones of China (RMSE

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.019

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 548

Metadata

Authors
Fan, J., Yue, W., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Cai, H., Wang, X., Lu, X., & Xiang, Y.
Venue
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
263
Pages
225-241
ISSN
0168-1923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889246260
Cited by
548
References
4
FWCI
20.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of SVM, ELM and four tree-based ensemble models for predicting daily reference evapotranspiration using limited meteorological data in different climates of China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.019
The paper
Fan, J., Yue, W., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Cai, H., Wang, X., Lu, X., & Xiang, Y. (2018). Evaluation of SVM, ELM and four tree-based ensemble models for predicting daily reference evapotranspiration using limited meteorological data in different climates of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.