Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Light Gradient Boosting Machine: An efficient soft computing model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with local and external meteorological data

Fan, Junliang, Ma, Xin, Wu, Lifeng, Zhang, Fucang, Yu, Xiang, Zeng, Wenzhi·2019·Agricultural Water Management

Abstract

Abstract Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is required in many fields, e.g. irrigation scheduling design, agricultural water management, crop growth modeling and drought assessment. Nevertheless, reliable estimation of ETo is difficult when lack of complete or long-term meteorological data at the target station. This study evaluated the efficiency of a new tree-based soft computing model, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), for estimating daily ET0 using limited local (target-station) and external (cross-station) meteorological data from 49 weather stations in humid subtropical region of China, including 16 in Jiangxi Province and other 33 in the region. The performance of LightGBM was compared with the tree-based M5 Model Tree (M5Tree) and Random Forests (RF) as well as four empirical models (Hargreaves-Samani, Tabari, Makkink and Trabert). Eight input combinations of daily meteorological data including maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), relative humidity (Hr), wind speed at 2 m height (U2), extraterrestrial solar radiation (Ra) and global solar radiation (Rs) calculated from sunshine duration (n) for the period 2001–2015 were used to test the models. The results showed that LightGBM was superior to M5Tree and RF in local applications under all input combinations during testing, with average root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.08–0.58 mm d−1, 0.11–0.62 mm d−1and 0.13–0.60 mm d−1, respectively. M5Tree performed slightly better than RF under input combinations 6–8, whereas RF outperformed M5Tree under the other input combinations. However, all three soft computing models produced much better daily ETo estimates than the corresponding empirical models with the same input variables. Rs was the most influential meteorological variable for daily ETo estimation in this region, followed by Tmax and Tmin, Hr and finally U2. In external applications, LightGBM also generally performed better than the RF, M5Tree and empirical models. Soft computing models developed with meteorological data from Station 57894, having the most similar climatic characteristics to the other stations, gave satisfactory ETo estimates for the 15 cross stations in Jiangxi Province, even for the other 33 stations across the humid subtropical region of China. LightGBM was proved to be efficient and exhibit good generalization capability in both local and external applications, which was thus recommended as an alternative model for daily ETo estimation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105758

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Metadata

Authors
Fan, J., Ma, X., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Yu, X., & Zeng, W.
Venue
Agricultural Water Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
225
Pages
105758
ISSN
0378-3774 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971270198
Cited by
455
References
31
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light Gradient Boosting Machine: An efficient soft computing model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with local and external meteorological data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105758
The paper
Fan, J., Ma, X., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Yu, X., & Zeng, W. (2019). Light Gradient Boosting Machine: An efficient soft computing model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with local and external meteorological data. Agricultural Water Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105758

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.