The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Light Gradient Boosting Machine: An efficient soft computing model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with local and external meteorological data
Abstract
Abstract Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is required in many fields, e.g. irrigation scheduling design, agricultural water management, crop growth modeling and drought assessment. Nevertheless, reliable estimation of ETo is difficult when lack of complete or long-term meteorological data at the target station. This study evaluated the efficiency of a new tree-based soft computing model, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), for estimating daily ET0 using limited local (target-station) and external (cross-station) meteorological data from 49 weather stations in humid subtropical region of China, including 16 in Jiangxi Province and other 33 in the region. The performance of LightGBM was compared with the tree-based M5 Model Tree (M5Tree) and Random Forests (RF) as well as four empirical models (Hargreaves-Samani, Tabari, Makkink and Trabert). Eight input combinations of daily meteorological data including maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), relative humidity (Hr), wind speed at 2 m height (U2), extraterrestrial solar radiation (Ra) and global solar radiation (Rs) calculated from sunshine duration (n) for the period 2001–2015 were used to test the models. The results showed that LightGBM was superior to M5Tree and RF in local applications under all input combinations during testing, with average root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.08–0.58 mm d−1, 0.11–0.62 mm d−1and 0.13–0.60 mm d−1, respectively. M5Tree performed slightly better than RF under input combinations 6–8, whereas RF outperformed M5Tree under the other input combinations. However, all three soft computing models produced much better daily ETo estimates than the corresponding empirical models with the same input variables. Rs was the most influential meteorological variable for daily ETo estimation in this region, followed by Tmax and Tmin, Hr and finally U2. In external applications, LightGBM also generally performed better than the RF, M5Tree and empirical models. Soft computing models developed with meteorological data from Station 57894, having the most similar climatic characteristics to the other stations, gave satisfactory ETo estimates for the 15 cross stations in Jiangxi Province, even for the other 33 stations across the humid subtropical region of China. LightGBM was proved to be efficient and exhibit good generalization capability in both local and external applications, which was thus recommended as an alternative model for daily ETo estimation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998) · FAO eBooks · Cited by 20,520
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29
Teymur, O., Zygalakis, K., & Calderhead, B. (2016) · Cited by 13,881
LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree
(2017) · HAL · Cited by 10,512
Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass
Penman, H. L. (1948) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1948.0037 · Cited by 7,307
Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature
Hargreaves, G. H., & Samani, Z. A. (1985) · Applied Engineering in Agriculture · doi:10.13031/2013.26773 · Cited by 4,574
Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration
Hargreaves, G. H., & Samani, Z. A. (1982) · Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division · doi:10.1061/jrcea4.0001390 · Cited by 1,879
Testing the Penman formula by means of lysimeters
Makkink, G. F. (1957) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 616
Fan, J., Yue, W., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Cai, H., Wang, X., Lu, X., & Xiang, Y. (2018) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.019 · Cited by 548
Self-citationA novel cryptocurrency price trend forecasting model based on LightGBM
Sun, X., Liu, M., & Sima, Z. (2020) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2018.12.032 · Cited by 519
Cited by
Ekanayake, I. U., Meddage, D. P. P., & Rathnayake, U. (2022) · Case Studies in Construction Materials · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01059 · Cited by 498
(2024) · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giae073 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, J., Ma, X., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Yu, X., & Zeng, W.
- Venue
- Agricultural Water Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 225
- Pages
- 105758
- ISSN
- 0378-3774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2971270198
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light Gradient Boosting Machine: An efficient soft computing model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with local and external meteorological data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105758
- The paper
- Fan, J., Ma, X., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Yu, X., & Zeng, W. (2019). Light Gradient Boosting Machine: An efficient soft computing model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with local and external meteorological data. Agricultural Water Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105758
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.