Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hybrid artificial intelligence models based on a neuro-fuzzy system and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of wildfire probability

Jaafari, Abolfazl, Zenner, Eric K., Panahi, Mahdi, Shahabi, Himan·2019·Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Abstract

Abstract This study provides a new comparative analysis of four hybrid artificial intelligence models for the spatially explicit prediction of wildfire probabilities. Each model consists of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) combined with a metaheuristic optimization algorithm, i.e., genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA), and imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA). A spatial database was constructed based on 159 fire events from the Hyrcanian ecoregion (Iran) for which a suite of predictor variables was derived. Each predictor variable was discretized into classes. The step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) procedure was used to assign weights to each class of each predictor variable. Weights indicate the strength of the spatial relationship between each class and fire occurrence and were used for training the hybrid models. The hybrid models were validated using several performance metrics and compared to the single ANFIS model. Although the single ANFIS model outperformed the hybrid models in the training phase, its accuracy decreased considerably in the validation phase. All hybrid models performed well for both training and validation datasets, but the ANFIS-ICA hybrid showed superior predictive performance of spatially explicit wildfire prediction and mapping for the dataset. The results clearly demonstrate the ability of the optimization algorithms to overcome the over-fitting problem of the single ANFIS model at the learning stage of the fire pattern. This study contributes to the suite of research that seeks to obtain reliable estimates of relative likelihoods of natural hazards.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.12.015

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Jaafari, A., Zenner, E. K., Panahi, M., & Shahabi, H.
Venue
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
266-267
Pages
198-207
ISSN
0168-1923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2907066318
Cited by
299
References
54
FWCI
20.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybrid artificial intelligence models based on a neuro-fuzzy system and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of wildfire probability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.12.015
The paper
Jaafari, A., Zenner, E. K., Panahi, M., & Shahabi, H. (2019). Hybrid artificial intelligence models based on a neuro-fuzzy system and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of wildfire probability. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.12.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.