Cited by 552Ethics and Social Impacts of AIInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine SystemsGreen IT and Sustainability

The AI gambit: leveraging artificial intelligence to combat climate change—opportunities, challenges, and recommendations

Open access
Cowls, Josh, Tsamados, Andreas, Taddeo, Mariarosaria, Floridi, Luciano·2023·AI & SOCIETY

Abstract

In this article, we analyse the role that artificial intelligence (AI) could play, and is playing, to combat global climate change. We identify two crucial opportunities that AI offers in this domain: it can help improve and expand current understanding of climate change, and it can contribute to combatting the climate crisis effectively. However, the development of AI also raises two sets of problems when considering climate change: the possible exacerbation of social and ethical challenges already associated with AI, and the contribution to climate change of the greenhouse gases emitted by training data and computation-intensive AI systems. We assess the carbon footprint of AI research, and the factors that influence AI’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in this domain. We find that the carbon footprint of AI research may be significant and highlight the need for more evidence concerning the trade-off between the GHG emissions generated by AI research and the energy and resource efficiency gains that AI can offer. In light of our analysis, we argue that leveraging the opportunities offered by AI for global climate change whilst limiting its risks is a gambit which requires responsive, evidence-based, and effective governance to become a winning strategy. We conclude by identifying the European Union as being especially well-placed to play a leading role in this policy response and provide 13 recommendations that are designed to identify and harness the opportunities of AI for combatting climate change, while reducing its impact on the environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-021-01294-x

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data collection, analysis, and storage processes in AI development require much computational power, which consumes enormous amounts of energy.

    “Likewise, data collection, analysis, and storage processes in AI development require much computational power, which consumes enormous amounts of energy (Cowls et al. 2021;Kouhizadeh et al. 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. ACM (2020) Artifact review and badging—current. https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-and-badging-current
  2. Coleman C, Kang D, Narayanan D, Nardi L, Zhao T, Zhang J, Bailis P, Olukotun K, Re C, Zaharia M (2019b) Analysis of DAWNBench, a time-to-accuracy machine learning performance benchmark. http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01427 [Cs, Stat] · arXiv
  3. Dahlquist E (2020) The FUDIPO Project: AI systems in process industries. https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/415798-using-ai-to-improve-energy-and-resource-efficiency-in-various-industries
  4. Hooker S (2020) The hardware lottery. http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.06489 [Cs] · arXiv
  5. NeurIPS (2020) OpenReview. https://openreview.net/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cowls, J., Tsamados, A., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Floridi, Luciano
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2021-10-18
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
283-307
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W3207559276
Cited by
552
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 7
FWCI
77.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
Keywords
artificial intelligence, climate change mitigation, carbon footprint of AI, greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency, AI ethics, AI governance, EU climate policy, environmental impact of computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review