The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Satellite-based soybean yield forecast: Integrating machine learning and weather data for improving crop yield prediction in southern Brazil
Abstract
Abstract Soybean yield predictions in Brazil are of great interest for market behavior, to drive governmental policies and to increase global food security. In Brazil soybean yield data generally demand various revisions through the following months after harvest suggesting that there is space for improving the accuracy and the time of yield predictions. This study presents a novel model to perform in-season (“near real-time”) soybean yield forecasts in southern Brazil using Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), Neural Networks, satellite imagery and weather data. The objectives of this study were to: (i) compare the performance of three different algorithms (multivariate OLS linear regression, random forest and LSTM neural networks) for forecasting soybean yield using NDVI, EVI, land surface temperature and precipitation as independent variables, and (ii) evaluate how early (during the soybean growing season) this method is able to forecast yield with reasonable accuracy. Satellite and weather data were masked using a non-crop-specific layer with field boundaries obtained from the Rural Environment Registry that is mandatory for all farmers in Brazil. Main outcomes from this study were: (i) soybean yield forecasts at municipality-scale with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.24 Mg ha−1 at DOY 64 (march 5) (ii) a superior performance of the LSTM neural networks relative to the other algorithms for all the forecast dates except DOY 16 where multivariate OLS linear regression provided the best performance, and (iii) model performance (e.g., MAE) for yield forecast decreased when predictions were performed earlier in the season, with MAE increasing from 0.24 Mg ha−1 to 0.42 Mg ha−1 (last values from OLS regression) when forecast timing changed from DOY 64 (March 5) to DOY 16 (January 6). This research portrays the benefits of integrating statistical techniques, remote sensing, weather to field survey data in order to perform more reliable in-season soybean yield forecasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Liaw, A. I., & Wiener, M. C. (2007) · Cited by 18,594
Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone
Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031 · Cited by 14,719
Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions
Belgiu, M., & Drăguţ, L. (2016) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 · Cited by 7,142
New refinements and validation of the collection-6 MODIS land-surface temperature/emissivity product
Wan, Z. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.027 · Cited by 1,075
Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks
Khaki, S., & Wang, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00621 · Cited by 864
Forecasting crop yield using remotely sensed vegetation indices and crop phenology metrics
Bolton, D. K., & Friedl, M. A. (2013) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.01.007 · Cited by 785
Wardlow, B. D., & Egbert, S. L. (2008) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.019 · Cited by 768
A scalable satellite-based crop yield mapper
Lobell, D. B., Thau, D., Seifert, C., Engle, E., & Little, B. (2015) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.021 · Cited by 602
Cited by
Ayoub Shaikh, T., Rasool, T., & Rasheed Lone, F. (2022) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2022.107119 · Cited by 768
The digitization of agricultural industry – a systematic literature review on agriculture 4.0
Abbasi, R., Martinez, P., & Ahmad, R. (2022) · Smart Agricultural Technology · doi:10.1016/j.atech.2022.100042 · Cited by 531
Rashid, M., Bari, B. S., Yusup, Y., Kamaruddin, M. A., & Khan, N. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3075159 · Cited by 369
SatMAE: Pre-Training Transformers for Temporal and Multi-Spectral Satellite Imagery
Cong, Y., Khanna, S., Meng, C., Liu, P., Rozi, E., He, Y., Burke, M., Lobell, D., & Ermon, S. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-0015 · Cited by 303
Beres, B. L., Hatfield, J. L., Kirkegaard, J. A., Eigenbrode, S. D., Pan, W. L., Lollato, R. P., Hunt, J. R., Strydhorst, S., Porker, K., Lyon, D., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00828 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwalbert, R. A., Amado, T., Corassa, G., Pott, L. P., Prasad, P. V. V., & Ciampitti, I. A.
- Venue
- Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 284
- Pages
- 107886
- ISSN
- 0168-1923 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000098473
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 27.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Satellite-based soybean yield forecast: Integrating machine learning and weather data for improving crop yield prediction in southern Brazil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107886
- The paper
- Schwalbert, R. A., Amado, T., Corassa, G., Pott, L. P., Prasad, P. V. V., & Ciampitti, I. A. (2020). Satellite-based soybean yield forecast: Integrating machine learning and weather data for improving crop yield prediction in southern Brazil. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107886
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.