The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
Crop yield is a highly complex trait determined by multiple factors such as genotype, environment, and their interactions. Accurate yield prediction requires fundamental understanding of the functional relationship between yield and these interactive factors, and to reveal such relationship requires both comprehensive datasets and powerful algorithms. In the 2018 Syngenta Crop Challenge, Syngenta released several large datasets that recorded the genotype and yield performances of 2,267 maize hybrids planted in 2,247 locations between 2008 and 2016 and asked participants to predict the yield performance in 2017. As one of the winning teams, we designed a deep neural network (DNN) approach that took advantage of state-of-the-art modeling and solution techniques. Our model was found to have a superior prediction accuracy, with a root-mean-square-error (RMSE) being 12% of the average yield and 50% of the standard deviation for the validation dataset using predicted weather data. With perfect weather data, the RMSE would be reduced to 11% of the average yield and 46% of the standard deviation. We also performed feature selection based on the trained DNN model, which successfully decreased the dimension of the input space without significant drop in the prediction accuracy. Our computational results suggested that this model significantly outperformed other popular methods such as Lasso, shallow neural networks (SNN), and regression tree (RT). The results also revealed that environmental factors had a greater effect on the crop yield than genotype.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Classification And Regression Trees
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315139470 · Cited by 11,417
Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net
Springenberg, J. T., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T., & Riedmiller, M. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6806 · Cited by 3,447
Feature selection, L 1 vs. L 2 regularization, and rotational invariance
Ng, A. Y. (2004) · Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04 · doi:10.1145/1015330.1015435 · Cited by 1,572 · cited 4×
“We tried different values for the coefficient of L1 term (Ng, 2004) in the Lasso model, and found that values between 0.1 and 0.3 led to the most accurate predictions.”
MethodInfluentialTemperature and Solar Radiation Effects on Potential Maize Yield across Locations
Muchow, R. C., Sinclair, T. R., & Bennett, J. M. (1990) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200020033x · Cited by 403
Cooper, M., & DeLacy, I. H. (1994) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01240919 · Cited by 349
A NEURAL NETWORK FOR SETTING TARGET CORN YIELDS
Liu, J., Goering, C. E., & Tian, L. (2001) · Transactions of the ASAE · doi:10.13031/2013.6097 · Cited by 136
Cited by
A CNN-RNN framework for crop yield prediction
Khaki, S., Wang, L., & Archontoulis, S. V. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01750 · Cited by 722
Self-citationCoupling machine learning and crop modeling improves crop yield prediction in the US corn belt
Shahhosseini, M., Hu, G., Huber, I., & Archontoulis, S. V. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80820-1 · Cited by 452
A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection
Montesinos-López, O. A., Montesinos-López, A., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Barrón-López, J. A., Martini, J. W. R., Fajardo-Flores, S. B., Gaytan-Lugo, L. S., Santana-Mancilla, P. C., & Crossa, J. (2021) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-020-07319-x · Cited by 361
DNNGP, a deep neural network-based method for genomic prediction using multi-omics data in plants
Wang, K., Abid, M. A., Rasheed, A., Crossa, J., Hearne, S., & Li, H. (2023) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2022.11.004 · Cited by 278
High-throughput phenotyping: Breaking through the bottleneck in future crop breeding
Song, P., Wang, J., Guo, X., Yang, W., & Zhao, C. (2021) · The Crop Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cj.2021.03.015 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Khaki, S., & Wang, L.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-05-22
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 621-621
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2949642792
- Cited by
- 864
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 42.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2019.00621
- The paper
- Khaki, S., & Wang, L. (2019). Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.