Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrating Multi-Source Data for Rice Yield Prediction across China using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches

Cao, Juan, Zhang, Zhao, Tao, Fulu, Zhang, Liangliang, Luo, Yuchuan, Zhang, Jing, Han, Jichong, Xie, Jun·2021·Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Abstract

Abstract Timely and reliable yield prediction at a large scale is imperative and prerequisite to prevent climate risk and ensure food security, especially with climate change and increasing extreme climate events. In this study, integrating the publicly available data (i.e., satellite vegetation indexes, meteorological indexes, and soil properties) within the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform, we developed one Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, one machine learning (Random Forest, RF), and one deep learning (Long Short-Term Memory Networks, LSTM) model to predict rice yield at county-level across China. For satellite data, we compared the contiguous solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), a newly emerging satellite retrieval, with a traditional vegetation index (enhanced vegetation index, EVI). The results showed that LSTM (with R2 ranging from 0.77 to 0.87, RMSE from 298.11 to 724kg/ha) and RF (with R2 ranging from 0.76 to 0.82, RMSE from 366 to 723.3 kg/ha) models outperformed LASSO (with R2 ranging from 0.33 to 0.42, RMSE from 633.46 kg/ha to 1231.39 kg/ha) in yield prediction; and LSTM was better than RF. Besides, ESI (combining EVI and SIF together) could slightly improve the model performance compared with only using EVI or SIF as the single input, primarily due to the ability of satellite-based SIF in capturing extra information on drought and heat stress. Furthermore, we also explored the potential for timely rice yield prediction, and concluded that the optimal prediction could be achieved with approximately two/one-month leading-time before single/double rice maturity. Our findings demonstrated a scalable, simple and inexpensive methods for timely predicting rice yield over a large area with publicly available multi-source data, which can potentially be applied to areas with sparsely observed data and worldwide for estimating crop yields.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108275

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Metadata

Authors
Cao, J., Zhang, Z., Tao, F., Zhang, L., Luo, Y., Zhang, J., Han, J., & Xie, J.
Venue
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
297
Pages
108275
ISSN
0168-1923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111700100
Cited by
373
References
60
FWCI
19.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating Multi-Source Data for Rice Yield Prediction across China using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108275
The paper
Cao, J., Zhang, Z., Tao, F., Zhang, L., Luo, Y., Zhang, J., Han, J., & Xie, J. (2021). Integrating Multi-Source Data for Rice Yield Prediction across China using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108275

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.