Cited by 187Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchLivestock Farming and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An integrated sustainability assessment of mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification

Ripoll-Bosch, R., Díez-Unquera, B., Ruiz, R., Villalba, D., Molina, E., Joy, M., Olaizola, A., Bernués, A.·2012·Agricultural Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.10.003

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. de Rancourt, M., 2010. Milk sheep production systems in Europe, diversity and main trends, FAO-CIHEAM Network on Sheep and Goats: Economic, social and environmental sustainability in sheep and goat production systems. CIHAEM-FAO, Zaragoza, pp. 71–76.
  2. de Rancourt, M., Mottet, A., 2008. Mediterranean animal production: development or decline? Options Méditerraenéennes, Series A: Séminars Méditerraenéennes. Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerraenéennes, Montpellier, pp. 13–22.
  3. EEA, 2004. High Nature Value Farmland: characteristics, trends and policy challenges. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, pp. 27.
  4. Ruiz, R., Díez-Unquera, B., Beltrán de Heredia, I., Arranz, J., Mandaluniz, N., Ugarte, E., 2010. Is cheese making and marketing by farmers determining sustainability in dairy sheep? FAO-CIHEAM Network on Sheep and Goats: Economic, social and environmental sustainability in sheep and goat production systems. CIHAEM-FAO, Zaragoza, pp. 197–206.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–186 of 186

Metadata

Authors
Ripoll-Bosch, R., Díez-Unquera, B., Ruiz, R., Villalba, D., Molina, E., Joy, M., Olaizola, A., & Bernués, A.
Affiliations
  • Tecnalia (ES)
  • Universitat de Lleida (ES)
  • Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (ES)
Corresponding author
Bernués, A.
Venue
Agricultural Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
46-56
ISSN
0308-521X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160483424
Cited by
187
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
  • European Commission
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Livestock Farming and Management
Keywords
sheep farming, sustainability assessment, agricultural intensification, MESMIS framework, sustainability indicators, economic sustainability, environmental sustainability, social sustainability, pasture systems, dairy sheep farms, feed self-sufficiency, generational change, stakeholder engagement, Mediterranean agriculture, northeastern Spain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review