Cited by 513Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisSustainable Development and Environmental PolicyAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

SAFE—A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems

Van Cauwenbergh, N., Biala, K., Bielders, C., Brouckaert, V., Franchois, L., Garcia Cidad, V., Hermy, M., Mathijs, E. +8 more·2007·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

Sustainable development and the definition of indicators to assess progress towards sustainability have become a high priority in scientific research and on policy agendas. In this paper, we propose a consistent and comprehensive framework of principles, criteria and indicators (PC&I) for sustainability assessment of agricultural systems, referred to as the Sustainability Assessment of Farming and the Environment (SAFE) framework. In addition we formulate consistent and objective approaches for indicator identification and selection. The framework is designed for three spatial levels: the parcel level, the farm level and a higher spatial level that can be the landscape, the region or the state. The SAFE framework is hierarchical as it is composed of principles, criteria, indicators and reference values in a structured way. Principles are related to the multiple functions of the agro-ecosystem, which go clearly beyond the production function alone. The multifunctional character of the agro-ecosystem encompasses the three pillars of sustainability: the environmental, economic and social pillars. Indicators and reference values are the end-products of the framework. They are the operational tools that are used for evaluating the sustainability of the agro-ecosystems. The proposed analytical framework is not intended to find a common solution for sustainability in agriculture as a whole, but to serve as an assessment tool for the identification, the development and the evaluation of agricultural production systems, techniques and policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2006.09.006

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High and disproportionate dependence on CAP subsidies (e.g., FS3) could hinder or slow down innovation and make farms highly vulnerable to policy reforms targeting subsidy reduction.

    “The high and disproportionate dependence on (Common Agricultural Policy-CAP) subsidies (e.g., FS3) could hinder or slow down innovation [29] and make farms highly vulnerable to any policy reforms that target the reduction of subsidies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Cauwenbergh, N., Biala, K., Bielders, C., Brouckaert, V., Franchois, L., Garcia Cidad, V., Hermy, M., Mathijs, E., Muys, B., Reijnders, J., Sauvenier, X., Valckx, J., Vanclooster, M., Van der Veken, B., Wauters, E., & Peeters, A.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
120
Issue
2-4
Pages
229-242
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155097591
Cited by
513
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
sustainability assessment, agricultural systems, SAFE framework, sustainability indicators, indicator selection, reference values, farm-level assessment, agricultural policy evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review