Farmers use intuition to reinvent analytic decision support for managing seasonal climatic variability
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Farmers tend to reduce model simulation results to a set of intuitive management rules, thereby foregoing model use as an on-going decision aid.
“Also, McCown et al. (2012) documented farmers' tendency to reduce model simulation results to a set of intuitive management rules, thereby foregoing model use as an on-going decision aid.”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as McCown et al., 2012
Cites
Carberry, P. S., Hochman, Z., Hunt, J. R., Dalgliesh, N. P., McCown, R. L., Whish, J. P. M., Robertson, M. J., Foale, M. A., Poulton, P. L., & van Rees, H. (2009) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp09052 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCown, R. L., Carberry, P. S., Dalgliesh, N. P., Foale, M. A., & Hochman, Z.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- McCown, R.L.
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-45
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045208372
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Keywords
- farmer decision-making, judgment and decision making, climate variability, soil water management, computer simulation, scenario analysis, yield prediction, management rules, heuristic decision making, benchmarking, agricultural advisors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
