Cited by 97Climate change impacts on agricultureSmart Agriculture and AICrop Yield and Soil Fertility

Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 3. Relevance of APSIM to commercial crops

Carberry, P. S., Hochman, Z., Hunt, J. R., Dalgliesh, N. P., McCown, R. L., Whish, J. P. M., Robertson, M. J., Foale, M. A. +2 more·2009·Crop & Pasture Science

Abstract

Crop simulation models relevant to real-world agriculture have been a rationale for model development over many years. However, as crop models are generally developed and tested against experimental data and with large systematic gaps often reported between experimental and farmer yields, the relevance of simulated yields to the commercial yields of field crops may be questioned. This is the third paper in a series which describes a substantial effort to deliver model-based decision support to Australian farmers. First, the performance of the cropping systems simulator, APSIM, in simulating commercial crop yields is reported across a range of field crops and agricultural regions. Second, how APSIM is used in gaining farmer credibility for their planning and decision making is described using actual case studies. Information was collated on APSIM performance in simulating the yields of over 700 commercial crops of barley, canola, chickpea, cotton, maize, mungbean, sorghum, sugarcane, and wheat monitored over the period 1992 to 2007 in all cropping regions of Australia. This evidence indicated that APSIM can predict the performance of commercial crops at a level close to that reported for its performance against experimental yields. Importantly, an essential requirement for simulating commercial yields across the Australian dryland cropping regions is to accurately describe the resources available to the crop being simulated, particularly soil water and nitrogen. Five case studies of using APSIM with farmers are described in order to demonstrate how model credibility was gained in the context of each circumstance. The proposed process for creating mutual understanding and credibility involved dealing with immediate questions of the involved farmers, contextualising the simulations to the specific situation in question, providing simulation outputs in an iterative process, and together reviewing the ensuing seasonal results against provided simulations. This paper is distinct from many other reports testing the performance and utility of cropping systems models. Here, the measured yields are from commercial crops not experimental plots and the described applications were from real-life situations identified by farmers. A key conclusion, from 17 years of effort, is the proven ability of APSIM to simulate yields from commercial crops provided soil properties are well characterised. Thus, the ambition of models being relevant to real-world agriculture is indeed attainable, at least in situations where biotic stresses are manageable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/cp09052

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carberry, P. S., Hochman, Z., Hunt, J. R., Dalgliesh, N. P., McCown, R. L., Whish, J. P. M., Robertson, M. J., Foale, M. A., Poulton, P. L., & van Rees, H.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • CBirchip Cropping Group, PO Box 85, Birchip, Vic. 3483, Australia.
Venue
Crop & Pasture Science
Published
2009-10-19
Volume
60
Issue
11
Pages
1044-1056
ISSN
  • 0004-9409 (ISSN-L)
  • 1836-0947
  • 1836-5795
OpenAlex
W2144038500
Cited by
97
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Keywords
APSIM, crop simulation models, model-based decision support, rainfed agriculture, yield prediction, soil water, nitrogen availability, soil properties, barley, canola, chickpea, cotton, maize, mungbean, sorghum, sugarcane, wheat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review