Cited by 44Climate change impacts on agricultureClimate variability and modelsRemote Sensing in Agriculture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cotton yields as influenced by ENSO at different planting dates and spatial aggregation levels

Paz, Joel O., Woli, Prem, Garcia y Garcia, Axel, Hoogenboom, Gerrit·2012·Agricultural Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Ahuja, 2007, Whole-system integration and modeling essential to agricultural science and technology for the 21st century, J. Crop Improv., 19, 73, 10.1300/J411v19n01_04 · DOI
  2. Brolley, 2007, Experimental drought threat forecast for Florida, Agric. Forest Meteorol., 145, 84, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.003 · DOI
  3. Cabrera, 2006, Impact of climate information on reducing farm risk by optimizing crop insurance strategy, Trans. ASABE, 49, 1223, 10.13031/2013.21722 · DOI
  4. Christopher, J.P., 2007. Improving irrigated cropping systems on the High Plains using crop simulation models. M.S. Thesis. Kansas State University.
  5. Culpepper, 2009, Weed control and crop response to glufosinate applied to ‘PHY 485 WRF’ cotton, Weed Technol., 23, 356, 10.1614/WT-08-168.1 · DOI
  6. de Wit, 2005, Spatial resolution of precipitation and radiation: The effect on regional crop yield forecasts, Agric. Forest Meteorol., 135, 156, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.11.012 · DOI
  7. Fraisse, 2006, AgClimate: a climate forecast information system for agricultural risk management in the southeastern USA, Comput. Electron Agric., 53, 13, 10.1016/j.compag.2006.03.002 · DOI
  8. Fraisse, 2008, El Niño–Southern Oscillation influences on soybean yields in eastern Paraguay, Int. J. Climatol., 28, 1399, 10.1002/joc.1641 · DOI
  9. Garcia y Garcia, 2005, Evaluation of an improved daily solar radiation generator for the southeastern USA, Climate Res., 29, 91, 10.3354/cr029091 · DOI
  10. Garcia y Garcia, 2006, Analysis of interannual variation of peanut yield in Georgia using a dynamic crop simulation model, Trans. ASAE, 49, 2005, 10.13031/2013.22281 · DOI
  11. Garcia y Garcia, 2008, Impact of generated solar radiation on simulated crop growth and yield, Ecol. Modell., 210, 312, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Garcia y Garcia, 2010, Enso-based climate variability affects water use efficiency of rainfed cotton grown in the southeastern USA, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 139, 629, 10.1016/j.agee.2010.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Garnett, 1992, The impact of large-scale atmospheric circulations and anomalies on Indian monsoon droughts and floods and on world grain yields – a statistical analysis, Agric. Forest. Meteorol., 61, 113, 10.1016/0168-1923(92)90028-3 · DOI
  14. Guerra, 2007, Irrigation water use estimates based on crop simulation models and kriging, Agric. Water Manage, 89, 199, 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hammer, 2001, Advances in application of climate prediction in agriculture, Agric. Syst., 70, 515, 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00058-0 · DOI
  16. Handler, 1990, USA corn yields, the El Niño and agricultural drought: 1867–1988, Int. J. Climatol., 10, 819, 10.1002/joc.3370100804 · DOI
  17. Hansen, 1998, ENSO influences on agriculture in the southeastern United States, J. Clim., 11, 404, 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<0404:EIOAIT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  18. Jagtap, 2002, Adaptation and evaluation of the CROPGRO-soybean model to predict regional yield and production, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 93, 73, 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00358-9 · DOI
  19. Jones, 2000, Potential benefits of climate forecast to agriculture, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 82, 169, 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00225-5 · DOI
  20. Kiladis, 1989, Global climatic anomalies associated with extremes in the Southern Oscillation, J. Clim., 2, 1069, 10.1175/1520-0442(1989)002<1069:GCAAWE>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  21. Lobell, 2006, Evaluating strategies for improved water use in spring wheat with CERES, Agric. Water Manage., 84, 249, 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.02.007 · DOI
  22. López-Cedrón, 2008, Improving the CERES-Maize model ability to simulate water deficit impact on maize production and yield components, Agron. J., 100, 296, 10.2134/agrojnl2007.0088 · DOI
  23. Mavromatis, 2002, El Niño-Southern oscillation effects on peanut yield and nitrogen leaching, Clim. Res., 22, 129, 10.3354/cr022129 · DOI
  24. Messina, C., Ramkrishnan, P.B., Jones, J.W., Boote, K.J., Hoogenboom, G., Ritchie, J.T., 2004. A simulation model of cotton growth and development for CSM. In: Proc. Biological Systems Simulation Conference. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, pp. 54–55.
  25. Nash, 1970, River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I: a discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · DOI
  26. Nuti, 2006, Effect of planting date, mepiquat chloride, and glyphosate application to glyphosate-resistant cotton, Agron. J., 98, 1627, 10.2134/agronj2005.0360 · DOI
  27. Oram, P.A., 1989. Sensitivity of agricultural production to climatic change, an update. In: Proc. International Symposium on Climate Variability and Food Security in Developing Countries. IRRI, Los Banos, the Philippines, pp. 25–44.
  28. Ortiz, 2009, Adapting the CROPGRO-Cotton model to simulate cotton biomass and yield under southern root-knot nematode parasitism, Trans. ASABE, 52, 2129, 10.13031/2013.29201 · DOI
  29. Paz, 2007, Development of an ENSO-based irrigation decision support tool for peanut production in the Southeastern US, Comput. Electron. Agric., 55, 28, 10.1016/j.compag.2006.11.003 · DOI
  30. Phillips, 1999, The role of ENSO in determining climate and maize variability in the U.S. corn belt, Int. J. Climatol., 19, 877, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(19990630)19:8<877::AID-JOC406>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  31. Podestá, 2002, Use of ENSO-related climate information in agricultural decision making in Argentina: a pilot experience, Agric. Syst., 74, 371, 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00046-X · DOI
  32. Richardson, 1981, Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation, Water Resour. Res., 17, 182, 10.1029/WR017i001p00182 · DOI
  33. Ropelewski, 1986, North American precipitation and temperature patterns associated with the El Niño/South Oscillation (ENSO), Mon. Weather Rev., 114, 2352, 10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<2352:NAPATP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. Solow, 1998, The value of improved ENSO prediction to US agriculture, Clim. Change, 39, 47, 10.1023/A:1005342500057 · DOI
  35. Steinemann, 2006, Using climate forecasts for drought management, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 45, 1353, 10.1175/JAM2401.1 · DOI
  36. Suleiman, 2007, Evaluation of FAO-56 crop coefficient procedures for deficit irrigation management of cotton in a humid climate, Agric. Water Manage., 91, 33, 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Wassenaar, 1999, Modelling wheat yield responses to soil and climate variability at the regional scale, Clim. Res., 1999, 209, 10.3354/cr011209 · DOI
  38. Willmott, 1981, On the validation of models, Phys. Geogr., 2, 184, 10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Woli, 2012, Evaluation of various methods for estimating global solar radiation in the southeastern USA, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 51, 972, 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0141.1 · DOI
  40. Zamora, 2009, Modeling cotton production response to shading in a pecan alley cropping system using CROPGRO, Agroforest. Syst., 76, 423, 10.1007/s10457-008-9166-x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Paz, J. O., Woli, P., Garcia y Garcia, A., & Hoogenboom, G.
Affiliations
  • Mississippi State University (US)
  • Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Woli, Prem
Venue
Agricultural Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
111
Pages
45-52
ISSN
0308-521X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003056428
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Keywords
ENSO, cotton yield, sowing date, spatial aggregation, ENSO phases, La Niña, El Niño, lint yield, crop growth simulation, southeastern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review