Cited by 4,916Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisSoil Geostatistics and MappingGeography Education and Pedagogy

ON THE VALIDATION OF MODELS

Willmott, Cort J.·1981·Physical Geography

Abstract

Traditional methods of evaluating geographic models by statistical comparisons between observed and simulated variates are criticized. In particular, it is suggested that the correlation coefficient (r), its square and tests of their statistical significance are inadequate for such purposes. The root mean squared error (RMSE) and related measures as well as a new index of agreement (d) are alternatively presented as superior indices for making such comparisons. Arguments are made for increasing the number of digital algorithms and data plots being published.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MSS is a measure proposed by Willmott [39] that factors in both mean and variance differences and furnishes a comprehensive assessment of the agreement between the two datasets.

    “MSS, a measure proposed by Willmott [39] that factors in both mean and variance differences, furnishes a comprehensive assessment of the agreement between the two datasets.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willmott, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Willmott, Cort J.
Venue
Physical Geography
Published
1981-07
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
184-194
ISSN
  • 0272-3646 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-0557
OpenAlex
W2111286455
Cited by
4,916
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 352 · 2025: 305 · 2024: 340 · 2023: 323 · 2022: 385 · 2021: 344 · 2020: 312 · 2019: 316 · 2018: 272 · 2017: 215 · 2016: 237 · 2015: 180 · 2014: 191 · 2013: 159 · 2012: 151
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Geography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
model validation, geographic models, model evaluation, correlation coefficient, root mean square error, index of agreement, statistical significance tests, digital algorithms, data plots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review