Diversifying conservation agriculture and conventional tillage cropping systems to improve the wellbeing of smallholder farmers in Malawi
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inconclusive socio-economic outcomes indicate that the effect of the implementation of the same agroecological practice can differ across different locations or years.
“Inconclusive socio-economic outcomes indicate, in fact, that the effect of the implementation of the same agroecological practice can differ across different locations (e.g. Ali 2005) or years (e.g. TerAvest et al. 2019).”
From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as TerAvest et al. 2019
Cites
Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture
Pittelkow, C. M., Liang, X., Linquist, B. A., van Groenigen, K. J., Lee, J., Lundy, M. E., van Gestel, N., Six, J., Venterea, R. T., & van Kessel, C. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13809 · Cited by 1,688 · see citing works
Will Money Increase Subjective Well-Being?
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1014411319119 · Cited by 1,555 · see citing works
Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa : the heretics ’ view
Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., & Tittonell, P. (2009) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017 · Cited by 1,499 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review
Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“Inconclusive socio-economic outcomes indicate, in fact, that the effect of the implementation of the same agroecological practice can differ across different locations (e.g. Ali 2005) or years (e.g. TerAvest et al. 2019).”
BackgroundJohn, I., Snapp, S., Nord, A., Chimonyo, V., Gwenambira, C., & Chikowo, R. (2021) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2021.107585 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- TerAvest, D., Wandschneider, P. R., Thierfelder, C., & Reganold, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (KE)
- Corresponding author
- TerAvest, Dan
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 23-35
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914226084
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Agricultural Systems (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- CIMMYT CGIAR Research Program MAIZE
- USAID-funded Feed the Future program Africa RISING
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Keywords
- conservation agriculture, conventional tillage, crop rotation, smallholder farmers, farmer well-being, no-till maize, Ipomoea batatas, cassava, pulses, labor utilization, farm profitability, farm-gate prices, Dowa, Malawi
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
