The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil water balance models for determining crop water and irrigation requirements and irrigation scheduling focusing on the FAO56 method and the dual Kc approach
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This study reviews soil water balance (SWB) model approaches to determine crop irrigation requirements and scheduling irrigation adopting the FAO56 method. The Kc-ETo approach is discussed with consideration of baseline concepts namely standard vs. actual Kc concepts, as well as single and dual Kc approaches. Requirements for accurate SWB and appropriate parameterization and calibration are introduced. The one-step vs. the two-step computational approaches is discussed before the review of the FAO56 method to compute and partition crop evapotranspiration and related soil water balance. A brief review on transient state models is also included. Baseline information is concluded with a discussion on yields prediction and performance indicators related to water productivity. The study is continued with an overview on models development and use after publication of FAO24, essentially single Kc models, followed by a review on models following FAO56, particularly adopting the dual Kc approach. Features of dual Kc modeling approaches are analyzed through a few applications of the SWB model SIMDualKc, mainly for derivation of basal and single Kc, extending the basal Kc approach to relay intercrop cultivation, assessing alternative planting dates, determining beneficial and non-beneficial uses of water by an irrigated crop, and assessing the groundwater contribution to crop ET in the presence of a shallow water table. The review finally discusses the challenges placed to SWB modeling for real time irrigation scheduling, particularly the new modeling approaches for large scale multi-users application, use of cloud computing and adopting the internet of things (IoT), as well as an improved wireless association of modeling with soil and plant sensors. Further challenges refer to the use of remote sensing energy balance and vegetation indices to map Kc, ET and crop water and irrigation requirements. Trends are expected to change research issues relative to SWB modeling, with traditional models mainly used for research while new, fast-responding and multi-users models based on cloud and IoT technologies will develop into applications to the farm practice. Likely, the Kc-ETo will continue to be used, with ETo from gridded networks, re-analysis and other sources, and Kc data available in real time from large databases and remote sensing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · Cited by 27,578
Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Liew, M. W. V., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23153 · Cited by 13,446
MONTEITH, J. (1965) · PubMed · Cited by 5,169
A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). 1. Formulation
Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Menenti, M., Feddes, R. A., & Holtslag, A. A. M. (1998) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(98)00253-4 · Cited by 3,118
Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on Big Data
Philip Chen, C. L., & Zhang, C.-Y. (2014) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.015 · Cited by 3,047
Doorenbos, J., & Kassam, A. H. (1979) · Cited by 2,385
Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover
Ritchie, J. T. (1972) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr008i005p01204 · Cited by 2,240
Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements
Doorenbos, J. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,217
Simulation of field water use and crop yield
Feddes, R. A., Kowalik, P. J., & Zaradny, H. (1978) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 1,994
Evaporation from sparse crops‐an energy combination theory
Shuttleworth, W. J., & Wallace, J. S. (1985) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49711146910 · Cited by 1,732
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira, L. S., Paredes, P., & Jovanovic, N.
- Venue
- Agricultural Water Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 241
- Pages
- 106357
- ISSN
- 0378-3774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3042884492
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 18.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil water balance models for determining crop water and irrigation requirements and irrigation scheduling focusing on the FAO56 method and the dual Kc approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106357
- The paper
- Pereira, L. S., Paredes, P., & Jovanovic, N. (2020). Soil water balance models for determining crop water and irrigation requirements and irrigation scheduling focusing on the FAO56 method and the dual Kc approach. Agricultural Water Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.