Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover
Abstract
A model is presented for calculating the daily evaporation rate from a crop surface. It applies to a row crop canopy situation in which the soil water supply to the plant roots is not limited and the crop has not come into an advanced stage of maturation or senescence. The crop evaporation rate is calculated by adding the soil surface and plant surface components (each of these requiring daily numbers for the leaf area index), the potential evaporation, the rainfall, and the net radiation above the canopy. The evaporation from the soil surface Es is calculated in two stages: (1) the constant rate stage in which Es is limited only by the supply of energy to the surface and (2) the falling rate stage in which water movement to the evaporating sites near the surface is controlled by the hydraulic properties of the soil. The evaporation from the plant surfaces Ep is predicted by using an empirical relation based on local data, which shows how Ep is related to Eo through the leaf area index. The model was used to obtain the total evaporation rate E = Es + Ep of a developing grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) canopy in central Texas. The results agreed well with values for E measured directly with a weighing lysimeter.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The water balance in OZCOT is calculated using the Ritchie (1972) approach with a calibrated soil water extraction routine based on increasing supply with increasing depth of extraction over time.
“The water balance in OZCOT is calculated using the Ritchie (1972) approach with a calibrated soil water extraction routine based on increasing supply with increasing depth of extraction over time.”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Ritchie, 1972
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The DSSAT cropping system model
Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C. H., Boote, K. J., Batchelor, W. D., Hunt, L. A., Wilkens, P. W., Singh, U., Gijsman, A. J., & Ritchie, J. T. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00107-7 · Cited by 4,465 · see citing works
Self-citationAn overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation
Keating, B. A., Carberry, P. S., Hammer, G. L., Probert, M. E., Robertson, M. J., Holzworth, D., Huth, N. I., Hargreaves, J. N. G., Meinke, H., Hochman, Z., et al. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00108-9 · Cited by 2,878 · see citing works
Nutrient leaching in a Colombian savanna Oxisol amended with biochar
Major, J., Rondon, M., Molina, D., Riha, S. J., & Lehmann, J. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0128 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Li, M., Du, Y., Zhang, F., Bai, Y., Fan, J., Zhang, J., & Chen, S. (2019) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.041 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
HydroLOGIC: An irrigation management system for Australian cotton
Richards, Q. D., Bange, M. P., & Johnston, S. B. (2008) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.009 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Mishra, S. K., Kaur, V., & Singh, K. (2021) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.1002/agj2.20788 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Could biofuel development stress China's water resources?
Hao, M., Jiang, D., Wang, J., Fu, J., & Huang, Y. (2017) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12440 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ritchie, J. T.
- Corresponding author
- Ritchie, Joe T.
- ORCID
- Ritchie, Joe T.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1972-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1204-1213
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1994668402
- Cited by
- 2,240
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 78
- FWCI
- 14.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Water Resources Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Keywords
- row crops, soil evaporation, leaf area index, potential evaporation, net radiation, soil hydraulic properties, grain sorghum, sorghum, weighing lysimeter, evaporation modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review