Cited by 45Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart rate and cardiovascular healthBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Patterns of β-blocker utilization in patients with chronic heart failure: experience from a specialized outpatient heart failure clinic

Gupta, Ritesh, Tang, W.H.Wilson, Young, James B·2004·American Heart Journal

Abstract

Background Beta-blockers have been shown incontrovertibly to improve morbidity and survival in patients with heart failure. However, there is limited information regarding their use in clinical practice settings, and reasonable utilization targets for quality improvement initiatives have not been established.Method We identified 500 consecutive patients with chronic heart failure seen at a specialized outpatient heart failure clinic from March 2001 to May 2001, and retrospectively extracted clinical and drug information from an electronic medical record.Results In this cross-sectional analysis, the rate of beta-blocker utilization was 69%. Seventy-five percent of patients had at least tried a beta-blocker. Among those with beta-blockers initiated, 16% experienced side effects that led to drug discontinuation (9.1%) or down-titration (6.9%) that was similar across all NYHA classes. A lower utilization rate of beta-blockers was observed in patients of advanced age and those with diabetes mellitus, concomitant antiarrhythmic therapy, and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (P <.05). Respiratory disease remained the most common reason for withholding beta-blocker therapy, especially with severe obstructive (rather than restrictive) physiology.Conclusion It appears that about 70% of patients with chronic heart failure can be successfully treated with a beta-blocker in a specialized heart failure outpatient setting where physicians are committed to beta-blocker use in heart failure. It is possible that subgroups with lower utilization rates can be targeted for quality improvement initiatives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.07.022

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, R., Tang, W. H. W., & Young, J. B.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Young, James B
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
147
Issue
1
Pages
79-83
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094524567
Cited by
45
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
beta-blockers, chronic heart failure, drug discontinuation, adverse drug reactions, quality improvement, outpatient heart failure clinic, respiratory diseases, obstructive lung disease, diabetes mellitus, antiarrhythmic therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA functional class, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Carvedilol, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Age Factors, Aged, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Carbazoles, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Metoprolol, Middle Aged, Propanolamines, Respiratory Function Tests, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Drug Utilization Review

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review