Cited by 155Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Improving outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial

Open access
Kirchhof, Paulus, Breithardt, Günter, Camm, A. John, Crijns, Harry J., Kuck, Karl-Heinz, Vardas, Panos, Wegscheider, Karl·2013·American Heart Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Even on optimal therapy including anticoagulation and rate control, major cardiovascular complications (stroke, cardiovascular death, and acute heart failure) are common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Conceptually, maintenance of sinus rhythm could prevent adverse outcomes related to AF. Rhythm control therapy has been only moderately effective in published trials, and its potential benefit was offset by side effects of repeated interventions. RATIONALE: Rhythm control therapy applied early after the first diagnosis of AF could preserve atrial structure and function and maintain sinus rhythm more effectively than the current practice of delayed rhythm control (when symptoms persist after otherwise effective rate control). Furthermore, catheter ablation and new antiarrhythmic drugs have enhanced the potential effectiveness and safety of rhythm control therapy. The EAST will test whether an early, modern rhythm control therapy can reduce cardiovascular complications in AF. DESIGN: The EAST (Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial) will randomize approximately 3,000 patients with recent onset AF at risk for stroke (CHA₂DS₂VASc score ≥2) to either guideline-mandated usual care or to usual care plus early rhythm control therapy in a prospective, randomized, open, blinded outcome assessment trial. All patients will be followed up until the end of the trial for the composite primary outcome of cardiovascular death, stroke, worsening of heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Nights spent in hospital will be counted as a coprimary outcome. Usual care will consist of anticoagulation, therapy of underlying heart disease, and rate control as an initial approach. Early rhythm control therapy will consist of usual care plus rhythm control therapy by antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, and a patient-operated electrocardiographic device to monitor the ongoing rhythm. Key secondary outcomes include cognitive function and quality of life. CONCLUSION: EAST will determine whether rhythm control therapy, when applied early after the initial diagnosis of AF, can prevent cardiovascular complications associated with AF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.05.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 155

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. AFFIRM Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1825-33.

Authors
Kirchhof, P., Breithardt, G., Camm, A. J., Crijns, H. J., Kuck, K.-H., Vardas, P., & Wegscheider, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Kirchhof, Paulus
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
166
Issue
3
Pages
442-448
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052706088
Cited by
155
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, early rhythm control, stroke prevention, catheter ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs, sinus rhythm maintenance, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, myocardial infarction, CHA2DS2-VASc score, anticoagulation, rate control, cognitive function, quality of life
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Prospective Studies, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review