Improving outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Even on optimal therapy including anticoagulation and rate control, major cardiovascular complications (stroke, cardiovascular death, and acute heart failure) are common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Conceptually, maintenance of sinus rhythm could prevent adverse outcomes related to AF. Rhythm control therapy has been only moderately effective in published trials, and its potential benefit was offset by side effects of repeated interventions. RATIONALE: Rhythm control therapy applied early after the first diagnosis of AF could preserve atrial structure and function and maintain sinus rhythm more effectively than the current practice of delayed rhythm control (when symptoms persist after otherwise effective rate control). Furthermore, catheter ablation and new antiarrhythmic drugs have enhanced the potential effectiveness and safety of rhythm control therapy. The EAST will test whether an early, modern rhythm control therapy can reduce cardiovascular complications in AF. DESIGN: The EAST (Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial) will randomize approximately 3,000 patients with recent onset AF at risk for stroke (CHA₂DS₂VASc score ≥2) to either guideline-mandated usual care or to usual care plus early rhythm control therapy in a prospective, randomized, open, blinded outcome assessment trial. All patients will be followed up until the end of the trial for the composite primary outcome of cardiovascular death, stroke, worsening of heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Nights spent in hospital will be counted as a coprimary outcome. Usual care will consist of anticoagulation, therapy of underlying heart disease, and rate control as an initial approach. Early rhythm control therapy will consist of usual care plus rhythm control therapy by antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, and a patient-operated electrocardiographic device to monitor the ongoing rhythm. Key secondary outcomes include cognitive function and quality of life. CONCLUSION: EAST will determine whether rhythm control therapy, when applied early after the initial diagnosis of AF, can prevent cardiovascular complications associated with AF.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rhythm control and rate control have not demonstrated a reduction in long-term morbidity or mortality.
“Other interventions such as rhythm control and rate control improve AF-related symptoms and may preserve cardiac function, but have not demonstrated a reduction in long-term morbidity or mortality.40,41”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
In contemporary, well-controlled, randomized clinical trials in AF, the average annual stroke rate is about 1.5%.
“In contemporary, well-controlled, randomized clinical trials in AF, the average annual stroke rate is about 1.5% and the annualized death rate is around 3%. 40”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
In contemporary, well-controlled, randomized clinical trials in AF, the annualized death rate is around 3%.
“In contemporary, well-controlled, randomized clinical trials in AF, the average annual stroke rate is about 1.5% and the annualized death rate is around 3%. 40”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
Rhythm control and rate control may preserve cardiac function.
“Other interventions such as rhythm control and rate control improve AF-related symptoms and may preserve cardiac function, but have not demonstrated a reduction in long-term morbidity or mortality.40,41”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
Rhythm control and rate control improve AF-related symptoms.
“Other interventions such as rhythm control and rate control improve AF-related symptoms and may preserve cardiac function, but have not demonstrated a reduction in long-term morbidity or mortality.40,41”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
There is no current indication for catheter ablation to prevent cardiovascular outcomes, to allow desired withdrawal of anticoagulation, or to reduce hospitalization.
“There is no current indication for catheter ablation to prevent cardiovascular outcomes (or desired withdrawal of anticoagulation), or to reduce hospitalization.40,594”
From 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 155
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- AFFIRM Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1825-33.
- Authors
- Kirchhof, P., Breithardt, G., Camm, A. J., Crijns, H. J., Kuck, K.-H., Vardas, P., & Wegscheider, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Münster (DE)
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Kirchhof, Paulus
- Venue
- American Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 442-448
- ISSN
- 0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052706088
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 9.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, early rhythm control, stroke prevention, catheter ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs, sinus rhythm maintenance, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, myocardial infarction, CHA2DS2-VASc score, anticoagulation, rate control, cognitive function, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Prospective Studies, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review