The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rechanneling the cardiac proarrhythmia safety paradigm: A meeting report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium
Open accessAbstract
This white paper provides a summary of a scientific proposal presented at a Cardiac Safety Research Consortium/Health and Environmental Sciences Institute/Food and Drug Administration-sponsored Think Tank, held at Food and Drug Administration's White Oak facilities, Silver Spring, MD, on July 23, 2013, with the intention of moving toward consensus on defining a new paradigm in the field of cardiac safety in which proarrhythmic risk would be primarily assessed using nonclinical in vitro human models based on solid mechanistic considerations of torsades de pointes proarrhythmia. This new paradigm would shift the emphasis from the present approach that strongly relies on QTc prolongation (a surrogate marker of proarrhythmia) and could obviate the clinical Thorough QT study during later drug development. These discussions represent current thinking and suggestions for furthering our knowledge and understanding of the public health case for adopting a new, integrated nonclinical in vitro/in silico paradigm, the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay, for the assessment of a candidate drug's proarrhythmic liability, and for developing a public-private collaborative program to characterize the data content, quality, and approaches required to assess proarrhythmic risk in the absence of a Thorough QT study. This paper seeks to encourage multistakeholder input regarding this initiative and does not represent regulatory guidance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomarker definitions and their applications
Califf, R. M. (2018) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1535370217750088 · Cited by 1,528
Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
Advances in organ-on-a-chip engineering
Zhang, B., Korolj, A., Lai, B. F. L., & Radisic, M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0034-7 · Cited by 1,017
Karakikes, I., Ameen, M., Termglinchan, V., & Wu, J. C. (2015) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.117.305365 · Cited by 478
Organ-on-a-chip devices advance to market
Zhang, B., & Radisic, M. (2017) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc01554a · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Sager, P. T., Gintant, G., Turner, J. R., Pettit, S., & Stockbridge, N.
- Venue
- American Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 292-300
- ISSN
- 0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074527519
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rechanneling the cardiac proarrhythmia safety paradigm: A meeting report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.11.004
- The paper
- Sager, P. T., Gintant, G., Turner, J. R., Pettit, S., & Stockbridge, N. (2014). Rechanneling the cardiac proarrhythmia safety paradigm: A meeting report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium. American Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.11.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.