The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Birth prevalence of congenital heart defects in Norway 1994-2009—A nationwide study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The reasons for decreasing birth prevalence of congenital heart defects (CHDs) in several European countries and Canada are not fully understood. We present CHD prevalence among live births, stillbirths, and terminated pregnancies in an entire nation over a period of 16 years. METHODS: Information on all births in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, 1994-2009, was updated with information on CHD from the hospitals' Patient Administrative Systems, the National Hospital's clinical database for children with heart disease, and the Cause of Death Registry. Individuals with heart defects were assigned specific cardiac phenotypes. RESULTS: Among 954,413 births, 13,081 received a diagnosis of CHD (137.1 per 10,000 births, 133.2 per 10,000 live births). The prevalence per 10,000 births was as follows: heterotaxia, 1.6; conotruncal defects, 11.6; atrioventricular septal defects, 5.6; anomalous pulmonary venous return, 1.1; left outflow obstructions, 8.7; right outflow obstructions, 5.6; septal defects, 65.5; isolated patent ductus arteriosus, 24.6; and other specified or unspecified CHD, 12.7. Excluding preterm patent ductus arteriosus, the CHD prevalence was 123.4 per 10,000; per year, the prevalence increased with 3.5% (95% CI 2.5-4.4) in 1994-2005 and declined with 9.8% (-16.7 to -2.4) from 2005 onwards. Severe CHD prevalence was 30.7 per 10,000; per-year increase was 2.3% (1.1-3.5) in 1994-2004, and per-year decrease was 3.4% (-6.6 to -0.0) in 2004-2009. Numbers included severe CHD in stillbirths and terminated pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: The birth prevalence of CHD declined from around 2005. Specifically, the prevalence of severe CHD was reduced by 3.4% per year from 2004 through 2009.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The prevalence of Tetralogy of Fallot observed was found considerably higher compared to global estimate and reports of developed countries.”
In the citing paper
“In a subgroup analysis based on the geographic region, a surprisingly high prevalence was reported across all regions of Sub-Saharan Africa.”
In the citing paper
“Meanwhile, a 15-year Norwegian study reported a TOF prevalence of 2.1% among CHD cases [17].”
Citations
Cites
The incidence of congenital heart disease.
Hoffman, J. I. E., & Kaplan, S. (2002) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01886-7 · Cited by 6,099
Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide
van der Linde, D., Konings, E. E. M., Slager, M. A., Witsenburg, M., Helbing, W. A., Takkenberg, J. J. M., & Roos-Hesselink, J. W. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.025 · Cited by 3,452
Seeking causes: Classifying and evaluating congenital heart defects in etiologic studies
Botto, L. D., Lin, A. E., Riehle‐Colarusso, T. J., Malik, S., & Correa, A. (2007) · Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology · doi:10.1002/bdra.20403 · Cited by 476
Czeizel, A. E., Dudás, I., Vereczkey, A., & Bánhidy, F. G. (2013) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu5114760 · Cited by 373
Association Between Maternal Chronic Conditions and Congenital Heart Defects
Liu, S., Joseph, K. S., Lisonkova, S., Rouleau, J., den Hof, M. V., SAUVE, R. S., & Kramer, M. S. (2013) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.112.001054 · Cited by 285
Maternal Smoking and Congenital Heart Defects
Malik, S., Cleves, M. A., Honein, M. A., Romitti, P. A., Botto, L. D., Yang, S., Hobbs, C. A., & Study, A. T. N. B. D. P. (2008) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-1519 · Cited by 235
Ionescu‐Ittu, R., Marelli, A. J., Mackie, A. S., & Pilote, L. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b1673 · Cited by 209
Temporal variability in birth prevalence of cardiovascular malformations
Wren, C., Richmond, S. W. J., & Donaldson, L. (2000) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heart.83.4.414 · Cited by 197
Congenital Heart Disease in Pregnancies Complicated by Maternal Diabetes Mellitus
Lisowski, L. A., Verheijen, P. M., Copel, J. A., Kleinman, C. S., Wassink, S., Visser, G. H. A., & Meijboom, E. J. (2010) · Herz · doi:10.1007/s00059-010-3244-3 · Cited by 187
Maternal Smoking and Congenital Heart Defects in the Baltimore-Washington Infant Study
Alverson, C. J., Strickland, M. J., Gilboa, S. M., & Correa, A. (2011) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-1399 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genetics and Genomics of Congenital Heart Disease
Zaidi, S., & Brueckner, M. K. (2017) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.116.309140 · Cited by 612
Wu, W., He, J., & Shao, X. (2020) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000020593 · Cited by 424
Prepregnancy Diabetes and Offspring Risk of Congenital Heart Disease
Øyen, N., Díaz, L. J., Leirgul, E., Boyd, H. A., Priest, J. R., Mathiesen, E. R., Quertermous, T., Wohlfahrt, J., & Melbye, M. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.017465 · Cited by 266
Self-citationGenomic frontiers in congenital heart disease
Morton, S. U., Quiat, D., Seidman, J. G., & Seidman, C. E. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-021-00587-4 · Cited by 246
Prevalence of Congenital Heart Disease at Live Birth in China
Zhao, Q.-M., Liu, F., Wu, L., Ma, X.-J., Niu, C., & Huang, G.-Y. (2019) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.040 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Leirgul, E., Fomina, T., Brodwall, K., Greve, G., Holmstrøm, H., Vollset, S. E., Tell, G. S., & Øyen, N.
- Affiliations
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Leirgul, Elisabeth
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 956-964
- ISSN
- 0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160481214
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
- Keywords
- congenital heart disease, birth prevalence, secular trends, stillbirth, patent ductus arteriosus, conotruncal defects, atrioventricular septal defect, heterotaxia, anomalous pulmonary venous return, septal defects, Norway, Medical Birth Registry of Norway, cardiac phenotype, severe congenital heart disease
- MeSH terms
- Birth Certificates, Female, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Norway, Pregnancy, Registries, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review