Bayesian optimization for ternary complex prediction (BOTCP)
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Proximity-inducing compounds (PICs) are an emergent drug technology through which a protein of interest (POI), often a drug target, is brought into the vicinity of a second protein which modifies the POI’s function, abundance or localisation, giving rise to a therapeutic effect. One of the best-known examples for such compounds are heterobifunctional molecules known as proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs). PROTACs reduce the abundance of the target protein by establishing proximity to an E3 ligase which targets the protein towards degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway. Design of PROTACs in silico requires the computational prediction of the ternary complex consisting of POI, PROTAC molecule, and the E3 ligase. Here, we present a novel machine learning-based method for predicting PROTAC-mediated ternary complex structures using Bayesian optimization. We show how a fitness score combining an estimation of protein-protein interactions with PROTAC binding energy calculations enables the sample-efficient exploration of candidate structures. Furthermore, our method presents two novel scores for filtering and reranking which take PROTAC stability (Autodock-Vina based PROTAC stability score) and protein interaction restraints (the TCP-AIR score) into account. We evaluate our method using DockQ scores and demonstrate, that even with a clustering that require members to have a high similarity, i.e. with smaller clusters, we can assign high ranks to those clusters that contain poses close to the experimentally determined native structure of the ternary complexes. We also demonstrate the resultant improved yeild of near-native poses in these clusters.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Current strategies for the design of PROTAC linkers: a critical review
Troup, R. I., Fallan, C., & Baud, M. G. J. (2020) · Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy · doi:10.37349/etat.2020.00018 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Hines, J., Lartigue, S., Dong, H., Qian, Y., & Crews, C. M. (2019) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2918 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
PRosettaC: Rosetta Based Modeling of PROTAC Mediated Ternary Complexes
Zaidman, D., Prilusky, J., & London, N. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00589 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Petrylak, D. P., Gao, X., Vogelzang, N. J., Garfield, M. H., Taylor, I., Dougan Moore, M., Peck, R. A., & Burris, H. A. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.3500 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Novel immunomodulatory drugs and neo-substrates
Gao, S., Wang, S., & Song, Y. (2020) · Biomarker Research · doi:10.1186/s40364-020-0182-y · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Bai, N., Riching, K. M., Makaju, A., Wu, H., Acker, T. M., Ou, S.-C., Zhang, Y., Shen, X., Bulloch, D. N., Rui, H., et al. (2022) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101653 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Li, W., Zhang, J., Guo, L., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01150 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence
Duran-Frigola, M., Cigler, M., & Winter, G. E. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c11098 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rao, A., Tunjic, T. M., Brunsteiner, M., Müller, M., Fooladi, H., Gasbarri, C., & Weber, N.
- Corresponding author
- Rao, Arjun
- ORCID
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 100072
- ISSN
- 2667-3185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4366401387
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- PROTACs, Bayesian optimization, E3 ubiquitin ligase, protein-protein interaction, heterobifunctional molecules, structure-based drug design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review