Cited by 25Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Degradation and InhibitorsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Bayesian optimization for ternary complex prediction (BOTCP)

Open access
Rao, Arjun, Tunjic, Tin M., Brunsteiner, Michael, Müller, Michael, Fooladi, Hosein, Gasbarri, Chiara, Weber, Noah·2023·Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Proximity-inducing compounds (PICs) are an emergent drug technology through which a protein of interest (POI), often a drug target, is brought into the vicinity of a second protein which modifies the POI’s function, abundance or localisation, giving rise to a therapeutic effect. One of the best-known examples for such compounds are heterobifunctional molecules known as proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs). PROTACs reduce the abundance of the target protein by establishing proximity to an E3 ligase which targets the protein towards degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway. Design of PROTACs in silico requires the computational prediction of the ternary complex consisting of POI, PROTAC molecule, and the E3 ligase. Here, we present a novel machine learning-based method for predicting PROTAC-mediated ternary complex structures using Bayesian optimization. We show how a fitness score combining an estimation of protein-protein interactions with PROTAC binding energy calculations enables the sample-efficient exploration of candidate structures. Furthermore, our method presents two novel scores for filtering and reranking which take PROTAC stability (Autodock-Vina based PROTAC stability score) and protein interaction restraints (the TCP-AIR score) into account. We evaluate our method using DockQ scores and demonstrate, that even with a clustering that require members to have a high similarity, i.e. with smaller clusters, we can assign high ranks to those clusters that contain poses close to the experimentally determined native structure of the ternary complexes. We also demonstrate the resultant improved yeild of near-native poses in these clusters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ailsci.2023.100072

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rao, A., Tunjic, T. M., Brunsteiner, M., Müller, M., Fooladi, H., Gasbarri, C., & Weber, N.
Corresponding author
Rao, Arjun
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
3
Pages
100072
ISSN
2667-3185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366401387
Cited by
25
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
PROTACs, Bayesian optimization, E3 ubiquitin ligase, protein-protein interaction, heterobifunctional molecules, structure-based drug design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review