An algorithm to simulate missing data for mixed meal tolerance test response curves
Open accessAbstract
Background Response curves formed by analyte concentrations measured at sampled time points after consuming a mixed meal are increasingly being used to characterize responses to differing diets. Unfortunately, owing to a variety of reasons, analyte concentrations for some of the time points may be missing. Objectives This study aimed to develop an algorithm to estimate the missing values at sampled time points in the analyte response curve to a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). Methods We developed an algorithm to simulate the missing postprandial concentration values for an MMTT. The algorithm was developed to handle any number of missing values for 2 or less consecutive missing values. The algorithm was tested on MMTT response curve data for glucose and triglyceride measurements in data from 3 different studies with 2119 postprandial MMTT response curves. The algorithm was validated by removing concentration values that were not missing and replacing them with the algorithm simulated values. The AUC error between the actual curve and simulated curves were also calculated. A web-based application was developed to automatically simulate missing values for an uploaded MMTT data set. Results The algorithm was programmed in Python and the resulting web-based application and a video tutorial were provided. The validation indicated good agreement between actual and simulated values with error increasing for less frequently sampled time points. The study with the mean minimum error…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Missing MMTT postprandial glucose and insulin concentration values were filled using the algorithm published in [16].
“We used the algorithm published in [16] through the web-based software to fill in the missing values.”
From Defining and Characterizing Postprandial Reactive Hypoglycemia (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Defining and Characterizing Postprandial Reactive Hypoglycemia
Sweatt, S. K., Thomas, D. M., LaPorte, G. J., Chauff, S., Stefanovski, D., & Gower, B. A. (2026) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu18050822 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- LaPorte, G. J., Chauff, S., Cammack, J., Burton-Freeman, B., Krakoff, J., Stinson, E. J., Gower, B., Redman, L. M., & Thomas, D. M.
- Affiliations
- United States Military Academy (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thomas, Diana M
- ORCID
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-07
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 145-152
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11347845
- OpenAlex
- W4395469292
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P30DK079626, UG1HD107697, R01 DK67538, UG1HD107688, AOD22022001, P30DK056336, UG1HD107696)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- mixed meal tolerance test, missing data imputation, glucose, triglycerides, dietary response, algorithm development, web application
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Blood Glucose, Humans, Triglycerides, Postprandial Period, Meals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review