Cited by 44Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Optimization of initial energy for cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias with biphasic shocks

Reisinger, Johann, Gstrein, Christine, Winter, Thomas, Zeindlhofer, Eduard, Höllinger, Kurt, Mori, Michael, Schiller, Alexandra, Winter, Andreas +2 more·2010·The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Objective Recommendations for optimal first-shock energies with biphasic waveforms are conflicting. We evaluated prospectively the relation between type and duration of atrial tachyarrhythmias and the probability of successful cardioversion with a specific biphasic shock waveform to develop recommendations for the initial energy setting aiming at the lowest total cumulative energy with 2 or less consecutive shocks.Methods We analyzed 453 consecutive patients undergoing their first transthoracic electrical cardioversion, including 358 attempts for atrial fibrillation (AF) and 95 attempts for atrial flutter (AFL) or atrial tachycardia (AT). A step-up protocol with a truncated exponential biphasic waveform starting at 50 J was used. Total cumulative energies were estimated under the assumption of a 2-tiered escalating shock protocol with different initial energy settings and a "rescue shock" of 250 J for AFL/AT or 360 J for AF. The initial energy setting leading to the lowest total cumulative energy was regarded as the optimal first-shock level.Results Cardioversion was successful in 448 patients (cumulative efficacy, 99 %). In patients with AFL/AT, the lowest total cumulative energy was attained with an initial energy setting of 50 J. In patients with AF, lowest values were achieved with an initial energy of 100 J for arrhythmia durations of 2 days or less and an initial energy of 150 J for arrhythmia durations of more than 2 days.Conclusion We recommend an initial energy setting of 50 J in patients with AFL/AT, of 100 J in patients with AF 2 days or less, and of 150 J with AF more than 2 days.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.10.028

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reisinger, J., Gstrein, C., Winter, T., Zeindlhofer, E., Höllinger, K., Mori, M., Schiller, A., Winter, A., Geiger, H., & Siostrzonek, P.
Affiliations
Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern (AT)
Venue
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
159-165
ISSN
0735-6757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986506402
Cited by
44
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia, cumulative energy, arrhythmia duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Electric Countershock, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Tachycardia, Ectopic Atrial, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review