Cited by 60Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentInflammation biomarkers and pathwaysAcute Kidney Injury Research

Effectiveness of arterial, venous, and capillary blood lactate as a sepsis triage tool in ED patients

Contenti, Julie, Corraze, Hervé, Lemoël, Fabien, Levraut, Jacques·2015·The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Objective We evaluate the capacity of arterial (ABL), peripheral venous (VBL), and capillary (CBL) blood lactate concentration to early detect the presence of severe sepsis in patients admitted to the emergency department for a septic syndrome.Methods Patients with signs of sepsis presenting to the emergency department were prospectively enrolled. Blood lactate was measured using a handheld point-of-care analyzer on microsamples of arterial, peripheral venous, and capillary blood. An arterial blood sample was dispatched to the central laboratory as a reference measurement.Results A total of 103 patients were enrolled in the study, with 63 patients presenting with a severe sepsis. There was a strong correlation between the point of care and the reference blood lactate measurement. The CBL, VBL, and ABL were all significantly different (3.01±0.29, 2.51±0.21, and 2.03±0.18 mmol/L, respectively; P<.001). The VBL value was the most efficient to detect early the presence of severe sepsis (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.85±0.04, 0.76±0.05, and 0.75±0.05 for VBL, ABL, and CBL, respectively; P<.01). Mortality at 28 days was related to the severity of sepsis (28.6% vs 7.5%) and to the number or organ dysfunctions (P<.01). Arterial blood lactate, VBL, and CBL were all significantly associated with the 28th-day mortality.Conclusions Initial VBL may be used efficiently to assess the severity of sepsis, and it could even be more effective than ABL and CBL to early detect the presence of severe sepsis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.11.003

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Contenti, J., Corraze, H., Lemoël, F., & Levraut, J.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
Corresponding author
Levraut, Jacques
Venue
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
167-172
ISSN
0735-6757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089146960
Cited by
60
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
sepsis, blood lactate, venous blood lactate, capillary blood lactate, arterial lactate, sepsis severity, 28-day mortality, point-of-care testing, emergency department, organ dysfunction
MeSH terms
Aged, Arteries, Blood Specimen Collection, Capillaries, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Triage, Veins, Sepsis, Point-of-Care Systems, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review