The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emergency department medication dispensing reduces return visits and admissions
Abstract
Objectives Return visits to the emergency department (ED) and subsequent readmissions are common for patients who are unable to fill their prescriptions. We sought to determine if dispensing medications to patients in an ED was a cost-effective way to decrease return ED visits and hospital admissions for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Methods A retrospective review of ED visits for SSTIs, during the 24 weeks before and after the implementation of a medication dispensing program, was conducted. Charts were analyzed for both ED return visits and hospital admissions within 7 days and 30 days of the initial ED visit. Return visits were further reviewed to determine if the clinical conditions on subsequent visits were related to the initial ED presentation. A cost analysis comparing the cost of treatment to cost savings for return visits was also performed. Results Before the implementation of the medication dispensing program, the return rate in 7 days for the same condition was 9.1% and the rate of admission was 2.8%. The return rate for the same condition in 8-30 days was 2.1% and the rate of admission was 1.0%. After the implementation of the medication dispensing program, the return rate for the same condition in 7 days was 8.0%, and the admission rate was 1.7%. The return rate for the same condition in 8-30 days was 0.8%, and the admission rate was 0%. The total cost of dispensed medications was $4050, while total cost savings were estimated to be $95,477. Conclusi…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Among people who inject drugs (PWID), skin, soft tissue, and vascular infections (SSTVI) at drug injection sites are the leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations, globally [5–12].”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Saunders, 1987, Patient compliance in filling prescriptions after discharge from the emergency department, Am J Emerg Med, 5, 283, 10.1016/0735-6757(87)90351-2 · DOI
- Hohl, 2009, Adherence to emergency department discharge prescriptions, CJEM, 11, 131, 10.1017/S148180350001109X · DOI
- Yamamoto, 2012, Dispensing medications at the hospital upon discharge from an emergency department, Pediatrics, 129, e562, 10.1542/peds.2011-3444 · DOI
- Sabbatini, 2016, In-hospital outcomes and costs among patients hospitalized during a return visit to the emergency department, JAMA, 315, 663, 10.1001/jama.2016.0649 · DOI
- Kripalani, 2008, Medication use among Inner-city patients after hospital discharge: patient-reported barriers and solutions, Mayo Clin Proc, 83, 529, 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60724-6 · DOI
- Hayes, 2012, To-go medications for decreasing ED return visits, Am J Emerg Med, 30, 2011, 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.01.027 · DOI
- Sarangarm, 2017, Patients given take home medications instead of paper prescriptions are more likely to return to emergency department, Hosp Pharm, 52, 438, 10.1177/0018578717717396 · DOI
- Phillips, 2017, Risk factors associated with skin and soft tissue infections among hospitalized people who inject drugs, J Addict Med, 11, 461, 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000346 · DOI
- Visconti, 2019, Primary care for persons who inject drugs, Am Fam Physician, 99, 109
- Gilbert, 2019, Self-care habits among people who inject drugs with skin and soft tissue infections: a qualitative analysis, Harm Reduct J, 16, 69, 10.1186/s12954-019-0345-z · DOI
- Tun, 2018, Age-based health and economic burden of skin and soft tissue infections in the United States, 2000 and 2012, PLoS One, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0206893 · DOI
- van der Linden, 2014, Unscheduled return visits to a Dutch inner-city emergency department, Int J Emerg Med, 7, 23, 10.1186/s12245-014-0023-6 · DOI
- Seeleang, 2014, Skin and soft tissue infection management, outcomes, and follow-up in the emergency department of an urban academic hospital, Adv Emerg Nurs J, 36, 348, 10.1097/TME.0000000000000039 · DOI
- Schreyer, 2017, The economics of an admissions holding unit, West J Emerg Med, 18, 553, 10.5811/westjem.2017.4.32740 · DOI
- Suaya, 2014, Incidence and cost of hospitalizations associated with Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections in the United States from 2001 through 2009, BMC Infect Dis, 14, 296, 10.1186/1471-2334-14-296 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lim, J., Russell, W. A., El-Sheikh, M., Buckeridge, D. L., & Panagiotoglou, D. (2024) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-024-01037-3 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Blome, A., Kaigh, C., Shaffer, C., Peoples, E., Satz, W. A., Kim, E., Baby, G., Stauffer, K., & Schreyer, K. E.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2387-2390
- ISSN
- 0735-6757
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review