Cited by 39Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Mapping Allele-Specific DNA Methylation: A New Tool for Maximizing Information from GWAS

Open access
Tycko, Benjamin·2010·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

In this issue of The Journal, an article by Schalkwyk et al.(1) shows the landscape of allele-specific DNA methylation (ASM) in the human genome. ASM has long been studied as a hallmark of imprinted genes, and a chromosome-wide version of this phenomenon occurs, in a random fashion, during X chromosome inactivation in female cells. But the type of ASM motivating the study by Schalkwyk et al. is different. They used a high-resolution, methylation-sensitive SNP array (MSNP) method for genome-wide profiling of ASM in total peripheral-blood leukocytes (PBL) and buccal cells from a series of monozygotic twin pairs. Their data bring a new level of detail to our knowledge of a newly recognized phenomenon-nonimprinted, sequence-dependent ASM. They document the widespread occurrence of this phenomenon among human genes and discuss its basic implications for gene regulation and genetic-epigenetic interactions. But this paper and recent work from other laboratories(2,3) raises the possibility of a more immediate and practical application for ASM mapping, namely to help extract maximum information from genome-wide association studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.01.021

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many genetic and epigenetic factors, including multiple rare single nucleotide variants, copy number variations, and other structural variation, likely contribute to common complex diseases.

    “It is now widely believed that many genetic and epigenetic factors are likely to contribute to common complex diseases, including multiple rare SNVs (defined by convention as those that have frequencies < 1%), copy number variations (CNVs), and other forms of structural variation. 3–12”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tycko, B.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Tycko, Benjamin
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
109-112
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041936754
Cited by
39
References
38
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
allele-specific methylation, genome-wide association study, epigenetic inheritance, genetic-epigenetic interaction, monozygotic twins, gene expression regulation, imprinted genes, X chromosome inactivation
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Base Sequence, Chromosome Mapping, Humans, DNA Methylation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review