Cited by 271Forensic and Genetic ResearchRace, Genetics, and SocietyGenetic diversity and population structure

Inferring genetic ancestry: Opportunities, challenges, and implications

Open access
Royal, Charmaine D., Novembre, John, Fullerton, Stephanie M., Goldstein, David B., Long, Jeffrey C., Bamshad, Michael J., Clark, Andrew G.·2010·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Increasing public interest in direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic ancestry testing has been accompanied by growing concern about issues ranging from the personal and societal implications of the testing to the scientific validity of ancestry inference. The very concept of "ancestry" is subject to misunderstanding in both the general and scientific communities. What do we mean by ancestry? How exactly is ancestry measured? How far back can such ancestry be defined and by which genetic tools? How do we validate inferences about ancestry in genetic research? What are the data that demonstrate our ability to do this correctly? What can we say and what can we not say from our research findings and the test results that we generate? This white paper from the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) Ancestry and Ancestry Testing Task Force builds upon the 2008 ASHG Ancestry Testing Summary Statement in providing a more in-depth analysis of key scientific and non-scientific aspects of genetic ancestry inference in academia and industry. It culminates with recommendations for advancing the current debate and facilitating the development of scientifically based, ethically sound, and socially attentive guidelines concerning the use of these continually evolving technologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.03.011

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such analyses are enabling new ways to explore and discuss ancestries that move us beyond blunt definitions of self-identified race.

    “and enabling new ways to explore and discuss ancestries that move us beyond blunt definitions of self-identified race.”

    From ASHG Denounces Attempts to Link Genetics and Racial Supremacy (2018) · cites this paper as [8]

    The available copy returns only the table of contents and a list of web resources; it provides no substantive passage from the named sections. Searches for self-identified race and for genetic ancestry offering a more nuanced account than racial categories did not retrieve text addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Such analyses are providing increasingly accurate ways of helping to define individuals' ancestral origins.

    “Such analyses 8 are providing increasingly accurate ways of helping to define individuals' ancestral origins”

    From ASHG Denounces Attempts to Link Genetics and Racial Supremacy (2018) · cites this paper as [8]

    Our indexed copy yields a table of contents, including an “Accuracy of Ancestry Inferences” heading, and a list of links, but no substantive passage from that section. Searches for increasingly accurate ancestry inference and advances in genetic analysis found no text establishing the claimed improvement, so the claim cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The past decade has seen the emergence of strategies for assessing an individual's genetic ancestry.

    “The past decade has seen the emergence of strategies for assessing an individual's genetic ancestry.”

    From ASHG Denounces Attempts to Link Genetics and Racial Supremacy (2018) · cites this paper as [8]

    The available indexed passages contain a contents heading, “Tools for Inferring Ancestry,” but no discussion establishing when those strategies emerged. Searches for the past decade, ancestry-estimation methods, and relevant dates returned only the contents and a list of websites, so the claimed timeline cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Royal, C. D., Novembre, J., Fullerton, S. M., Goldstein, D. B., Long, J. C., Bamshad, M. J., & Clark, A. G.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Royal, Charmaine D.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
86
Issue
5
Pages
661-673
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170315275
Cited by
271
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL072810, R01HL072904)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG003229)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
genetic ancestry inference, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, genetic ancestry testing, genetic ancestry
MeSH terms
Genes, Genetic Testing, Humans, Patients, Genetic Research, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review