Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Analytic and Diagnostic Performance of Singleton and Trio, Rapid Genome and Exome Sequencing in Ill Infants

Open access
Kingsmore, Stephen F., Cakici, Julie A., Clark, Michelle M., Gaughran, Mary, Feddock, Michele, Batalov, Sergey, Bainbridge, Matthew N., Carroll, Jeanne, Caylor, Sara A., Clarke, Christina, Ding, Yan, Ellsworth, Katarzyna, Farnaes, Lauge, Hildreth, Amber, Hobbs, Charlotte, James, Kiely, Kint, Cyrielle I., Lenberg, Jerica, Nahas, Shareef, Prince, Lance, Reyes, Iris, Salz, Lisa, Sanford, Erica, Schols, Peter, Sweeney, Nathaly, Tokita, Mari, Veeraraghavan, Narayanan, Watkins, Kelly, Wigby, Kristen, Wong, Terence, Chowdhury, Shimul, Wright, Meredith S., Dimmock, David, Bezares, Zaira, Bloss, Cinnamon, Braun, Joshua J.A., Diaz, Carlos, Mashburn, Dana, Tamang, Dorjee, Orendain, Daniken, Friedman, Jenni, Gleeson, Joe, Barea, Jaime, Chiang, George, Cohenmeyer, Casey, Coufal, Nicole G., Evans, Marva, Honold, Jose, Hovey, Raymond L., Kimball, Amy, Lane, Brian, Le, Crystal, Le, Jennie, Leibel, Sandra, Moyer, Laurel, Mulrooney, Patrick, Oh, Daeheon, Ordonez, Paulina, Oriol, Albert, Ortiz-Arechiga, Maria, Puckett, Laura, Speziale, Mark, Suttner, Denise, Van Der Kraan, Lucitia, Knight, Gail, Sauer, Charles, Song, Richard, White, Sarah, Wise, Audra, Yamada, Catherine·2019·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

The second Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health study was a randomized, controlled trial of the effectiveness of rapid whole-genome or -exome sequencing (rWGS or rWES, respectively) in seriously ill infants with diseases of unknown etiology. Here we report comparisons of analytic and diagnostic performance. Of 1,248 ill inpatient infants, 578 (46%) had diseases of unknown etiology. 213 infants (37% of those eligible) were enrolled within 96 h of admission. 24 infants (11%) were very ill and received ultra-rapid whole-genome sequencing (urWGS). The remaining infants were randomized, 95 to rWES and 94 to rWGS. The analytic performance of rWGS was superior to rWES, including variants likely to affect protein function, and ClinVar pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (p < 0.0001). The diagnostic performance of rWGS and rWES were similar (18 diagnoses in 94 infants [19%] versus 19 diagnoses in 95 infants [20%], respectively), as was time to result (median 11.0 versus 11.2 days, respectively). However, the proportion diagnosed by urWGS (11 of 24 [46%]) was higher than rWES/rWGS (p = 0.004) and time to result was less (median 4.6 days, p < 0.0001). The incremental diagnostic yield of reflexing to trio after negative proband analysis was 0.7% (1 of 147). In conclusion, rapid genomic sequencing can be performed as a first-tier diagnostic test in inpatient infants. urWGS had the shortest time to result, which was important in unstable infants, and those in whom a genetic diagnosis was likely to impact immediate management. Further comparison of urWGS and rWES is warranted because genomic technologies and knowledge of variant pathogenicity are evolving rapidly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.08.009

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Kingsmore, S. F., Cakici, J. A., Clark, M. M., Gaughran, M., Feddock, M., Batalov, S., Bainbridge, M. N., Carroll, J., Caylor, S. A., Clarke, C., Ding, Y., Ellsworth, K., Farnaes, L., Hildreth, A., Hobbs, C., James, K., Kint, C. I., Lenberg, J., Nahas, S., Prince, L., Reyes, I., Salz, L., Sanford, E., Schols, P., Sweeney, N., Tokita, M., Veeraraghavan, N., Watkins, K., Wigby, K., Wong, T., Chowdhury, S., Wright, M. S., Dimmock, D., Bezares, Z., Bloss, C., Braun, J. J. A., Diaz, C., Mashburn, D., Tamang, D., Orendain, D., Friedman, J., Gleeson, J., Barea, J., Chiang, G., Cohenmeyer, C., Coufal, N. G., Evans, M., Honold, J., Hovey, R. L., Kimball, A., Lane, B., Le, C., Le, J., Leibel, S., Moyer, L., Mulrooney, P., Oh, D., Ordonez, P., Oriol, A., Ortiz-Arechiga, M., Puckett, L., Speziale, M., Suttner, D., Van Der Kraan, L., Knight, G., Sauer, C., Song, R., White, S., Wise, A., & Yamada, C.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
105
Issue
4
Pages
719-733
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2975298736
Cited by
352
References
9
FWCI
22.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Analytic and Diagnostic Performance of Singleton and Trio, Rapid Genome and Exome Sequencing in Ill Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.08.009
The paper
Kingsmore, S. F., Cakici, J. A., Clark, M. M., Gaughran, M., Feddock, M., Batalov, S., Bainbridge, M. N., Carroll, J., Caylor, S. A., Clarke, C., Ding, Y., Ellsworth, K., Farnaes, L., Hildreth, A., Hobbs, C., James, K., Kint, C. I., Lenberg, J., Nahas, S., . . . Yamada, C. (2019). A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Analytic and Diagnostic Performance of Singleton and Trio, Rapid Genome and Exome Sequencing in Ill Infants. The American Journal of Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.08.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.