TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in The Netherlands
Open accessAbstract
The Netherlands launched a nationwide implementation study on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier test offered to all pregnant women. This started on April 1, 2017 as the TRIDENT-2 study, licensed by the Dutch Ministry of Health. In the first year, NIPT was performed in 73,239 pregnancies (42% of all pregnancies), 7,239 (4%) chose first-trimester combined testing, and 54% did not participate. The number of trisomies 21 (239, 0.33%), 18 (49, 0.07%), and 13 (55, 0.08%) found in this study is comparable to earlier studies, but the Positive Predictive Values (PPV)-96% for trisomy 21, 98% for trisomy 18, and 53% for trisomy 13-were higher than expected. Findings other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13 were reported on request of the pregnant women; 78% of women chose to have these reported. The number of additional findings was 207 (0.36%); these included other trisomies (101, 0.18%, PPV 6%, many of the remaining 94% of cases are likely confined placental mosaics and possibly clinically significant), structural chromosomal aberrations (95, 0.16%, PPV 32%,) and complex abnormal profiles indicative of maternal malignancies (11, 0.02%, PPV 64%). The implementation of genome-wide NIPT is under debate because the benefits of detecting other fetal chromosomal aberrations must be balanced against the risks of discordant positives, parental anxiety, and a potential increase in (invasive) diagnostic procedures. Our first-year data, including clinical data and laboratory follow-up data, will fuel this debate. Furthermore, we describe how NIPT can successfully be embedded into a national screening program with a single chain for prenatal care including counseling, testing, and follow-up.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For the detection of rarer chromosomal anomalies, the positive predictive value was estimated at 32% for structural aberrations.
“Moreover, for the detection of rarer chromosomal anomalies, the positive predictive value was estimated at 32% for structural aberrations”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [82]
Cites
Arber, D. A., Orazi, A., Hasserjian, R., Thiele, J., Borowitz, M. J., Le Beau, M. M., Bloomfield, C. D., Cazzola, M., & Vardiman, J. W. (2016) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544 · Cited by 10,119 · see citing works
Lewis, C., Hill, M., & Chitty, L. S. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153147 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hui, L., Ellis, K., Mayen, D., Pertile, M. D., Reimers, R., Sun, L., Vermeesch, J., Vora, N. L., & Chitty, L. S. (2023) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6357 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Discussing non‐invasive prenatal testing on Reddit: The benefits, the concerns, and the comradery
Marcon, A. R., Ravitsky, V., & Caulfield, T. (2021) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.5841 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- van der Meij, K. R. M., Sistermans, E. A., Macville, M. V. E., Stevens, S. J. C., Bax, C. J., Bekker, M. N., Bilardo, C. M., Boon, E. M. J., Boter, M., Diderich, K. E. M., de Die-Smulders, C. E. M., Duin, L. K., Faas, B. H. W., Feenstra, I., Haak, M. C., Hoffer, M. J. V., den Hollander, N. S., Hollink, I. H. I. M., Jehee, F. S., Knapen, M. F. C. M., Kooper, A. J. A., van Langen, I. M., Lichtenbelt, K. D., Linskens, I. H., van Maarle, M. C., Oepkes, D., Pieters, M. J., Schuring-Blom, G. H., Sikkel, E., Sikkema-Raddatz, B., Smeets, D. F. C. M., Srebniak, M. I., Suijkerbuijk, R. F., Tan-Sindhunata, G. M., van der Ven, A. J. E. M., van Zelderen-Bhola, S. L., Henneman, L., Galjaard, R.-J. H., Van Opstal, D., & Weiss, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Sistermans, Erik A.
- ORCID
- Sistermans, Erik A.
- Macville, Merryn V.E.
- Stevens, Servi J.C.
- Bax, Caroline J.
- Bekker, Mireille N.
- Bilardo, Caterina M.
- Boter, Marjan
- Diderich, Karin E.M.
- Duin, Leonie K.
- Faas, Brigitte H.W.
- Feenstra, Ilse
- Haak, Monique C.
- Hoffer, Mariëtte J.V.
- Hollink, Iris H.I.M.
- Knapen, Maarten F.C.M.
- Kooper, Angelique J.A.
- Lichtenbelt, Klaske D.
- Linskens, Ingeborg H.
- Oepkes, Dick
- Smeets, Dominique F.C.M.
- Srebniak, Malgorzata I.
- Tan-Sindhunata, Gita M.
- Henneman, Lidewij
- Galjaard, Robert-Jan H.
- Weiss, Marjan M.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1091-1101
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6904791
- OpenAlex
- W2984434858
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 40.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- ZonMw
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- non-invasive prenatal testing, Down syndrome, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, positive predictive value, chromosomal rearrangements, maternal malignancy, confined placental mosaicism, prenatal care
- MeSH terms
- Trisomy 13 Syndrome, Trisomy 18 Syndrome, Adolescent, Adult, Chromosome Aberrations, Down Syndrome, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genetic Testing, Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prenatal Diagnosis, Prognosis, Genome, Human, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review