Cited by 109Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Position statement from the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis on the use of non-invasive prenatal testing for the detection of fetal chromosomal conditions in singleton pregnancies

Open access
Hui, Lisa, Ellis, Katie, Mayen, Dora, Pertile, Mark D., Reimers, Rebecca, Sun, Luming, Vermeesch, Joris, Vora, Neeta L. +1 more·2023·Prenatal Diagnosis

Abstract

Key points What is already known about this topic? In 2015, the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD) published its first position statement on the use of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to screen for aneuploidy. Widespread uptake across the globe and subsequent published research has shed new light on test performance and implementation issues. What does this study add? This new position statement replaces the 2015 statement with updated information on the current technologies, clinical experience, and implementation practices. As an international organization, ISPD recognizes that there are important population‐specific considerations in the organization of prenatal screening and diagnosis. These opinions are designed to apply to high income settings where prenatal screening for aneuploidy is an established part of antenatal care. This position statement is not a clinical practice guideline but represents the consensus opinion of the current ISPD Board based on the current state of knowledge and clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pd.6357

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PPV for TS is generally lower than for other SCAs, due to factors such as confined placental mosaicism, maternal constitutional or somatic mosaicism and vanishing twin.

    “The PPV for TS is generally lower than for other SCAs, due to factors such as confined placental mosaicism, maternal constitutional or somatic mosaicism and vanishing twin.62,63”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hui, L., Ellis, K., Mayen, D., Pertile, M. D., Reimers, R., Sun, L., Vermeesch, J., Vora, N. L., & Chitty, L. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Illumina ANZ Sydney New South Wales Australia
  • Genetics Clinic Hospital Angeles Lomas Estado de Mexico Mexico
  • Victorian Clinical Genetics Services (AU)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hui, Lisa
Venue
Prenatal Diagnosis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-05-16
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
814-828
ISSN
  • 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0223
OpenAlex
W4366463259
Cited by
109
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 13
FWCI
39.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prenatal Diagnosis (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University of Melbourne
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR002552)
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1196010)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (L30 HG012137)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD105868)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
non-invasive prenatal testing, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, singleton pregnancy, high-income settings
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Prenatal Diagnosis, Chromosome Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review