Enhancement of hand hygiene compliance among health care workers from a hemodialysis unit using video-monitoring feedback
Abstract
Background The importance of hand hygiene in the prevention of health care-associated infection is well known. Experience with hand hygiene compliance (HHC) evaluation in hemodialysis units is scarce. Methods This study was a 3-phase, prospective longitudinal intervention study during a 5-month period in a 13-bed hemodialysis unit at a university hospital in Northern Mexico. The unit performs an average of 1,150 hemodialysis procedures per month. Compliance was evaluated by a direct observer and a video assisted observer. Feedback was given to health care workers in the form of educational sessions and confidential reports and video analysis of compliance and noncompliance. Results A total of 5,402 hand hygiene opportunities were registered; 5,201 during 7,820 minutes of video footage and 201 by direct observation during 1,180 minutes. Lower compliance during the baseline evaluation was observed by video monitoring compared with direct observation (P <0.05). Discrepancy between both methods was 29.2% (0.4%-59.8%); the average improvement in compliance during the study was 30.6% (range, 7.3%-75.5%). Global and Individual results for each subject revealed a statistically significant Improvement in the majority. Noncompliance according to WHO's 5 Moments for HH was greater for moment 5 (30.1%). We estimated that a health care worker in a hemodialysis unit could take 22-44.3% of working hours for proper hand hygiene compliance. Conclusions Video-assisted monitoring of hand hygiene is an excellent method for the evaluation of HHC in a hemodialysis unit; enhanced HHC can be achieved through a feedback program to the hemodialysis staff that includes video examples and confidential reports.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study conducted in Mexico confirmed that targeted hand hygiene monitoring can effectively improve hand hygiene compliance, which in turn improves the performance of a series of infection control and care quality indicators.
“A study conducted in Mexico confirmed that targeted hand hygiene monitoring can effectively improve hand hygiene compliance, which in turn improves the performance of a series of infection control and care quality indicators (33).”
From Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for hemodialysis vascular access: a Delphi study (2026) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, Y., He, L., Tang, S., Gao, Y., Chen, H., Shi, M., & Chen, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1858484
- Authors
- Sánchez-Carrillo, L. A., Rodríguez-López, J. M., Galarza-Delgado, D. Á., Baena-Trejo, L., Padilla-Orozco, M., Mendoza-Flores, L., & Camacho-Ortiz, A.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio Gonzalez (MX)
- Venue
- American Journal of Infection Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 868-872
- ISSN
- 0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321569649
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Infection Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Keywords
- hand hygiene compliance, hemodialysis unit, employee training, dialysis staff
- MeSH terms
- Behavior Observation Techniques, Feedback, Health Personnel, Hemodialysis Units, Hospital, Hospitals, University, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Mexico, Prospective Studies, Video Recording, Guideline Adherence, Hand Hygiene
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review