Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thickness Profiles of Retinal Layers by Optical Coherence Tomography Image Segmentation

Open access
Bagci, Ahmet Murat, Shahidi, Mahnaz, Ansari, Rashid, Blair, Michael, Blair, Norman Paul, Zelkha, Ruth·2008·American Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose To report an image segmentation algorithm that was developed to provide quantitative thickness measurement of 6 retinal layers in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Design Prospective cross-sectional study. Methods Imaging was performed with time and spectral domain OCT instruments in 15 and 10 normal healthy subjects, respectively. A dedicated software algorithm was developed for boundary detection based on a 2-D edge detection scheme, enhancing edges along the retinal depth while suppressing speckle noise. Automated boundary detection and quantitative thickness measurements derived by the algorithm were compared with measurements obtained from boundaries manually marked by 3 observers. Thickness profiles for 6 retinal layers were generated in normal subjects. Results The algorithm identified 7 boundaries and measured thickness of 6 retinal layers: nerve fiber layer (NFL), inner plexiform layer and ganglion cell layer (IPL+GCL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer and photoreceptor inner segments (ONL+PIS), and photoreceptor outer segments (POS). The root mean squared error (RMSE) between the manual and automatic boundary detection ranged between 4 and 9 microns. The mean absolute values of differences between automated and manual thickness measurements were between 3 – 4 microns, and comparable to inter-observer differences. Inner retinal thickness profiles demonstrated minimum thickness at the fovea, corresponding to normal anatomy. The OPL and ONL+PIS thickness profiles displayed a minimum and maximum thickness at the fovea, respectively. The POS thickness profile was relatively constant along the scan through the fovea. Conclusions The application of this image segmentation technique is promising for investigating thickness changes of retinal layers due to disease progression and therapeutic intervention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.06.010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Bagci, A. M., Shahidi, M., Ansari, R., Blair, M., Blair, N. P., & Zelkha, R.
Venue
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
146
Issue
5
Pages
679-687.e1
ISSN
0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108370292
Cited by
180
References
1
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thickness Profiles of Retinal Layers by Optical Coherence Tomography Image Segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.06.010
The paper
Bagci, A. M., Shahidi, M., Ansari, R., Blair, M., Blair, N. P., & Zelkha, R. (2008). Thickness Profiles of Retinal Layers by Optical Coherence Tomography Image Segmentation. American Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.06.010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.