The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Profile and Predictors of Normal Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measured with Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To describe the profile and identify the predictors of the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measured with frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) in normal eyes. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-two normal subjects underwent macular and optic disc scanning in both eyes with Cirrus high-definition (HD)-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association between GCIPL thickness and age, sex, ethnicity (Europeans, Africans, Hispanics, Asians, and Indians), eye laterality, refraction, intraocular pressure, axial length, central corneal thickness, mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, disc and rim areas, cup-to-disc area, vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc diameter ratios, vertical rim thickness, and OCT signal strength. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) age was 46.2 ± 16.9 years (range, 18-84 years). The mean and minimum GCIPL thicknesses (±SD) were 82.1 ± 6.2 and 80.4 ± 6.4 μm, respectively. There were significant differences in GCIPL thickness between macular sectors (P < 0.05), except between the superotemporal and inferonasal sectors (P = 0.63). The superonasal sector had the thickest and the inferior had the thinnest GCIPL. The GCIPL of the superior hemisphere was thicker than that of the inferior, and the nasal sector GCIPL was significantly thicker than the temporal one (P < 0.001). The average GCIPL did not differ between male and female subjects (P = 0.16) after adjustment for axial length and between ethnic groups (P = 0.41) after adjustment for age, axial length, and RNFL thickness. Significant predictors of mean GCIPL thickness were average RNFL thickness (β = 0.37, P < 0.001), age (β = -0.083, P < 0.001), axial length (β = -0.87, P = 0.001), and male sex (β = -1.62, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The independent factors associated with thinner GCIPL include thinner RNFL, older age, longer ocular axial length, and being male. Although the magnitude of the effect of age, axial length, and sex are small, these factors should be taken into account when interpreting Cirrus HD-OCT-based GCIPL thickness measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Topography of ganglion cells in human retina
Curcio, C. A., & Allen, K. A. (1990) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903000103 · Cited by 1,844
Kerrigan, L. A., Quigley, H. A., Pease, M. E., Kerrigan, D., & Mitchell, R. S. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 869
Improvements on Littmann's method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography
Bennett, A. G., Rudnicka, A. R., & Edgar, D. F. (1994) · Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/bf00175988 · Cited by 693
Determinants of Normal Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Stratus OCT
Budenz, D. L., Anderson, D. R., Varma, R., Schuman, J., Cantor, L., Savell, J., Greenfield, D. S., Patella, V. M., Quigley, H. A., & Tielsch, J. (2007) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.046 · Cited by 684
Self-citationThe Effect of Age on the Nerve Fiber Population of the Human Optic Nerve
Balazsi, A. G., Rootman, J., Drance, S. M., Schulzer, M., & Douglas, G. R. (1984) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/0002-9394(84)90509-9 · Cited by 502
Macular Segmentation with Optical Coherence Tomography
Ishikawa, H., Stein, D. M., Wollstein, G., Beaton, S., Fujimoto, J. G., & Schuman, J. S. (2005) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0335 · Cited by 498
Self-citationHuman optic nerve fiber count and optic disc size.
Jonas, J. B., Schmidt, A. M., Müller-Bergh, J. A., Schlötzer-Schrehardt, U. M., & Naumann, G. O. H. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 496
Perry, V. H., & Cowey, A. (1985) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(85)90004-5 · Cited by 494
Kang, S. H., Hong, S. W., Im, S. K., Lee, S. H., & Ahn, M. D. (2010) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4737 · Cited by 401
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in Myopia: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study
Leung, C. K.-S., Mohamed, S., Leung, K. S., Cheung, C. Y.-L., Chan, S. L.-W., Cheng, D. K.-Y., Lee, A. K.-C., Leung, G. Y. S., Rao, S. K., & Lam, D. S. C. (2006) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0545 · Cited by 392
Self-citation
Cited by
Glaucomatous damage of the macula
Hood, D. C., Raza, A. S., de Moraes, C. G. V., Liebmann, J. M., & Ritch, R. (2013) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.08.003 · Cited by 867
Self-citationA New Approach to Staging Diabetic Eye Disease
Channa, R., Wolf, R. M., Simo, R., Brigell, M., Fort, P., Curcio, C., Lynch, S., Verbraak, F., Abramoff, M. D., Abramoff, M. D., et al. (2024) · Ophthalmology Science · doi:10.1016/j.xops.2023.100420 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Mwanza, J.-C., Durbin, M. K., Budenz, D. L., Girkin, C. A., Leung, C. K., Liebmann, J. M., Peace, J. H., Werner, J. S., & Wollstein, G.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2011-10-04
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 7872
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2022681700
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Profile and Predictors of Normal Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measured with Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.11-7896
- The paper
- Mwanza, J.-C., Durbin, M. K., Budenz, D. L., Girkin, C. A., Leung, C. K., Liebmann, J. M., Peace, J. H., Werner, J. S., & Wollstein, G. (2011). Profile and Predictors of Normal Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measured with Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-7896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.