The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Choroidal Thickness in Normal Eyes Measured Using Cirrus HD Optical Coherence Tomography
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE To examine choroidal thickness and area in healthy eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). DESIGN Retrospective, observational case series METHODS Thirty-four eyes (34 subjects), with no retinal or choroidal disease, underwent high definition raster scanning using SD-OCT with frame enhancement software. Choroidal thickness was measured from the posterior edge of the retinal pigment epithelium to the choroid/sclera junction at 500 μm intervals up to 2500 μm temporal and nasal to the fovea. The central 1 mm area of the choroid was also measured, along with foveal thickness of the retina. All measurements were performed by two independent observers. Statistical analysis was used to correlate inter-observer findings, choroidal thickness and area measurements with age, and choroidal thickness with retinal foveal thickness. RESULTS The 34 subjects had a mean age of 51.1 years. Reliable measurements of choroidal thickness were obtainable in 74% of eyes examined. Choroidal thickness and area measurements had strong inter-observer correlation (r =0.92, P < 0.0001) and (r =0.93, P < 0.0001) respectively. Area had a moderate negative correlation with age (r =-0.62, P < 0.0001) that was comparable to the correlation between mean subfoveal choroidal thickness and age (r =-0.61, P < 0.0001). Retinal and choroidal thickness were found to be poorly correlated (r =-0.23, P = 0.18). Mean choroidal thickness showed a pattern of thinnest choroid nasally, thickening in the subfoveal region, and then thinning again temporally. Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness was found to be 272 μm (SD, +/- 81 μm). CONCLUSIONS Choroidal thickness can be measured using SD-OCT high definition raster scans in the majority of eyes. Choroidal thickness across the macula demonstrates a thin choroid nasally, thickest choroid sub-foveally, and again thinner temporally, and a trend toward decreasing choroidal thickness with age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tan, C. S., Ouyang, Y., Ruiz, H., & Sadda, S. R. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8782 · Cited by 784
Optical coherence tomography – current and future applications
Adhi, M., & Duker, J. S. (2013) · Current Opinion in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/icu.0b013e32835f8bf8 · Cited by 567
Self-citationOptical coherence tomography: Imaging of the choroid and beyond
Mrejen, S., & Spaide, R. F. (2013) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.12.001 · Cited by 477
Regatieri, C. V., Branchini, L., Carmody, J., Fujimoto, J. G., & Duker, J. S. (2012) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0b013e31822f5678 · Cited by 338
Self-citationManjunath, V., Goren, J., Fujimoto, J. G., & Duker, J. S. (2011) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.008 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Manjunath, V., Taha, M., Fujimoto, J. G., & Duker, J. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 325-329.e1
- ISSN
- 0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030375764
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Choroidal Thickness in Normal Eyes Measured Using Cirrus HD Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.018
- The paper
- Manjunath, V., Taha, M., Fujimoto, J. G., & Duker, J. S. (2010). Choroidal Thickness in Normal Eyes Measured Using Cirrus HD Optical Coherence Tomography. American Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.