The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diurnal Variation of Choroidal Thickness in Normal, Healthy Subjects Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the pattern and magnitude of diurnal variation of choroidal thickness (CT), its relation to systemic and ocular factors, and to determine the intervisit reproducibility of diurnal patterns. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 12 healthy volunteers who each underwent sequential ocular imaging on two separate days at five fixed, 2-hour time intervals. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) with enhanced depth imaging and image tracking was performed using a standardized protocol. Choroidal and retinal thicknesses were independently assessed by two masked graders. CT diurnal variation was assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: A significant diurnal variation in CT was observed, with mean maximum CT of 372.2 μm, minimum of 340.6 μm (P < 0.001), and mean diurnal amplitude of 33.7 μm. Retinal thickness (mean, 235.0 μm) did not exhibit significant diurnal variation (P = 0.621). The amplitude of CT variation was significantly greater for subjects with thicker morning baseline CT compared with those with thin choroids (43.1 vs. 10.5 μm, P < 0.001). There were significant correlations between amplitude of CT and age (P = 0.032), axial length (P < 0.001), and spherical equivalent (P < 0.001). The change in CT also correlated with change in systolic blood pressure (P = 0.031). Comparing CT on two different days, a similar diurnal pattern was observed, with no significant difference between corresponding measurements at the same time points (P = 0.180). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant diurnal variation of CT, with good intervisit reproducibility of diurnal patterns on two different days. The amplitude of variation varies with morning baseline CT, and is correlated with age, axial length, refractive error, and change in systolic blood pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enhanced Depth Imaging Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Spaide, R. F., Koizumi, H., & Pozonni, M. C. (2008) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.032 · Cited by 2,180
A Pilot Study of Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography of the Choroid in Normal Eyes
Margolis, R., & Spaide, R. F. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.008 · Cited by 1,344
IMAMURA, Y., FUJIWARA, T., MARGOLIS, R., & SPAIDE, R. F. (2009) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0b013e3181be0a83 · Cited by 955
Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography of the Choroid in Highly Myopic Eyes
Fujiwara, T., Imamura, Y., Margolis, R., Slakter, J. S., & Spaide, R. F. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.029 · Cited by 823
Chung, S. E., Kang, S. W., Lee, J. H., & Kim, Y. T. (2011) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.012 · Cited by 580
Diurnal Variations in Axial Length, Choroidal Thickness, Intraocular Pressure, and Ocular Biometrics
Chakraborty, R., Read, S. A., & Collins, M. J. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7364 · Cited by 499
Choroidal Thickness in Normal Eyes Measured Using Cirrus HD Optical Coherence Tomography
Manjunath, V., Taha, M., Fujimoto, J. G., & Duker, J. S. (2010) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.018 · Cited by 490
Ikuno, Y., & Tano, Y. (2009) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.08-3325 · Cited by 382
Spaide, R. F. (2009) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.010 · Cited by 373
Hirata, M., Tsujikawa, A., Matsumoto, A., Hangai, M., Ooto, S., Yamashiro, K., Akiba, M., & Yoshimura, N. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7729 · Cited by 365
Cited by
Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness: The Beijing Eye Study
Wei, W. B., Xu, L., Jonas, J. B., Shao, L., Du, K. F., Wang, S., Chen, C. X., Xu, J., Wang, Y. X., Zhou, J. Q., et al. (2013) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.048 · Cited by 599
Optical coherence tomography: Imaging of the choroid and beyond
Mrejen, S., & Spaide, R. F. (2013) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.12.001 · Cited by 477
Circadian rhythms, refractive development, and myopia
Chakraborty, R., Ostrin, L. A., Nickla, D. L., Iuvone, P. M., Pardue, M. T., & Stone, R. A. (2018) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/opo.12453 · Cited by 235
Ocular changes in TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer's disease
Tsai, Y., Lu, B., Ljubimov, A. V., Girman, S., Ross-Cisneros, F. N., Sadun, A. A., Svendsen, C. N., Cohen, R. M., & Wang, S. (2014) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12888 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, C. S., Ouyang, Y., Ruiz, H., & Sadda, S. R.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2012-01-25
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 261
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2084816571
- Cited by
- 784
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 35.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diurnal Variation of Choroidal Thickness in Normal, Healthy Subjects Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.11-8782
- The paper
- Tan, C. S., Ouyang, Y., Ruiz, H., & Sadda, S. R. (2012). Diurnal Variation of Choroidal Thickness in Normal, Healthy Subjects Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8782
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.