The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Histologic Development of the Human Fovea From Midgestation to Maturity
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To describe the histological development of the human central retina from fetal week (Fwk) 22 to 13 years. Design Retrospective observational case series Methods Retinal layers and neuronal substructures were delineated on foveal sections of fixed tissue stained in azure II-methylene blue and on frozen sections immunolabeled for cone, rod or glial proteins. Postmortem tissue was from 11 eyes at Fwk 20–27; 8 eyes at Fwk 28–37; 6 eyes at postnatal 1 day to 6 weeks; 3 eyes at 9–15 months; and 5 eyes at 28 months-13 years. Results At Fwk20–22 the fovea could be identified by the presence of a single layer of cones in the outer nuclear layer. Immunolabeling detected synaptic proteins, cone and rod opsins and Muller glial processes separating the photoreceptors. The foveal pit appeared at Fwk25, involving progressive peripheral displacement of ganglion cell, inner plexiform and inner nuclear layers. The pit became wider and shallower after birth, and appeared mature by 15months. Between Fwk25 and Fwk38, all photoreceptors developed more distinct inner and outer segments, but these were longer on peripheral than foveal cones. After birth the foveal outer nuclear layer became much thicker as cone packing occurred. Cone packing and neuronal migration during pit formation combined to form long central photoreceptor axons, which changed the outer plexiform layer from a thin sheet of synaptic pedicles into the thickest layer in the central retina by 15 months. Foveal inner and outer segment length matched peripheral cones by 15 months and was 4× longer by 13 years. Conclusions These data are necessary to understand the marked changes in human retina from late gestation to early adulthood. They provide qualitative and quantitative morphological information required to interpret the changes in hyper- and hypo-reflexive bands in pediatric spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) images at the same ages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Govetto, A., Lalane, R. A., Sarraf, D., Figueroa, M. S., & Hubschman, J. P. (2017) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.006 · Cited by 533
The Human Fetus Preferentially Engages with Face-like Visual Stimuli
Reid, V. M., Dunn, K., Young, R. J., Amu, J., Donovan, T., & Reissland, N. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.044 · Cited by 421
Health Effects of Carotenoids during Pregnancy and Lactation
Zielińska, M., Wesołowska, A., Pawlus, B., & Hamułka, J. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9080838 · Cited by 111
Achberger, K., Haderspeck, J. C., Kleger, A., & Liebau, S. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.05.005 · Cited by 75
Gene dosage manipulation alleviates manifestations of hereditary PAX6 haploinsufficiency in mice
Rabiee, B., Anwar, K. N., Shen, X., Putra, I., Liu, M., Jung, R., Afsharkhamseh, N., Rosenblatt, M. I., Fishman, G. A., Liu, X., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz4894 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendrickson, A., Possin, D., Vajzovic, L., & Toth, C. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 767-778.e2
- ISSN
- 0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027555661
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Histologic Development of the Human Fovea From Midgestation to Maturity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.05.007
- The paper
- Hendrickson, A., Possin, D., Vajzovic, L., & Toth, C. A. (2012). Histologic Development of the Human Fovea From Midgestation to Maturity. American Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.05.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.