The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early and Long-Term Responses to Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of Protocol I Data
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether early visual acuity response to ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema is associated with long-term outcome. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trial data. METHODS: Pooled data from the ranibizumab plus prompt and deferred laser treatment arms of the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network's Protocol I study were used to explore the relationship between early (week 12) and late (weeks 52-156) visual acuity response (mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity [CFB BCVA]; categorized improvement [<5, 5-9, or ≥10 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters] in BCVA). RESULTS: In the analysis population (340 eyes), <5-, 5- to 9-, and ≥10-letter BCVA improvements occurred in 39.7%, 23.2%, and 37.1% of eyes, respectively, at 12 weeks, and 34.2%, 16.5%, and 49.3% of eyes at 156 weeks. Within each early BCVA response category (<5, 5-9, and ≥10 letters of improvement at 12 weeks), mean CFB BCVA at 52-156 weeks varied by <5 letters from that at 12 weeks. CFB BCVA and <5-letter improvement at 12 weeks showed significant positive and negative association, respectively, with CFB BCVA and ≥10-letter improvement at 52 and 156 weeks. Similar relationships were demonstrated in eyes with baseline BCVA <69 letters, and associations remained significant after multivariate adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab ± laser therapy resulted in similar rates (∼40%) of suboptimal (<5-letter) and pronounced (≥10-letter) BCVA improvement at 12 weeks. Eyes with suboptimal early BCVA response showed poorer long-term visual outcomes than eyes with pronounced early response (mean improvement 3.0 vs 13.8 letters at 156 weeks).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elman, M. J., Ayala, A., Bressler, N. M., Browning, D., Flaxel, C. J., Glassman, A. R., Jampol, L. M., & Stone, T. W. (2015) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.047 · Cited by 562
Cited by
Antioxidant Phytochemicals as Potential Therapy for Diabetic Complications
Akpoveso, O.-O. P., Ubah, E. E., & Obasanmi, G. (2023) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox12010123 · Cited by 90
Fu, D. J., Mishra, A. V., Quek, C., Balaskas, K., Pontikos, N., Sim, D., Sivaprasad, S., & Faes, L. (2025) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-024-03529-9 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonzalez, V. H., Campbell, J., Holekamp, N. M., Kiss, S., Loewenstein, A., Augustin, A. J., Ma, J., Ho, A. C., Patel, V., Whitcup, S. M., & Dugel, P. U.
- Venue
- American Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 172
- Pages
- 72-79
- ISSN
- 0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2520557556
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early and Long-Term Responses to Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of Protocol I Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.012
- The paper
- Gonzalez, V. H., Campbell, J., Holekamp, N. M., Kiss, S., Loewenstein, A., Augustin, A. J., Ma, J., Ho, A. C., Patel, V., Whitcup, S. M., & Dugel, P. U. (2016). Early and Long-Term Responses to Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of Protocol I Data. American Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.