Cited by 90Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsCleft Lip and Palate Research

Improvement of nasal airway ventilation after rapid maxillary expansion evaluated with computational fluid dynamics

Iwasaki, Tomonori, Saitoh, Issei, Takemoto, Yoshihiko, Inada, Emi, Kanomi, Ryuzo, Hayasaki, Haruaki, Yamasaki, Youichi·2012·American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Abstract

Introduction Rapid maxillary expansion is known to improve nasal airway ventilation. However, it is difficult to precisely evaluate this improvement with conventional methods. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to use computational fluid dynamics to estimate the effect of rapid maxillary expansion.Methods Twenty-three subjects (9 boys, 14 girls; mean ages, 9.74 ± 1.29 years before rapid maxillary expansion and 10.87 ± 1.18 years after rapid maxillary expansion) who required rapid maxillary expansion as part of their orthodontic treatment had cone-beam computed tomography images taken before and after rapid maxillary expansion. The computed tomography data were used to reconstruct the 3-dimensional shape of the nasal cavity. Two measures of nasal airflow function (pressure and velocity) were simulated by using computational fluid dynamics.Results The pressure after rapid maxillary expansion (80.55 Pa) was significantly lower than before rapid maxillary expansion (147.70 Pa), and the velocity after rapid maxillary expansion (9.63 m/sec) was slower than before rapid maxillary expansion (13.46 m/sec).Conclusions Improvement of nasal airway ventilation by rapid maxillary expansion was detected by computational fluid dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.08.025

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iwasaki, T., Saitoh, I., Takemoto, Y., Inada, E., Kanomi, R., Hayasaki, H., & Yamasaki, Y.
Affiliations
  • Kagoshima University (JP)
  • Niigata University (JP)
Corresponding author
Iwasaki, Tomonori
Venue
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
141
Issue
3
Pages
269-278
ISSN
0889-5406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123856165
Cited by
90
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • KAKENHI
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19592360, 22592292)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Keywords
rapid maxillary expansion, nasal airflow, nasal cavity, computational fluid dynamics, nasal pressure, orthodontic treatment, pediatric patients
MeSH terms
Inhalation, Child, Dental Arch, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Maxilla, Nasal Cavity, Orthodontics, Corrective, Palatal Expansion Technique, Pressure, Pulmonary Ventilation, Nasal Obstruction, Computational Biology, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Exhalation, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Hydrodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review