The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accuracy of clear aligners: A retrospective study of patients who needed refinement
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of specific tooth movements with Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif). Methods: The study sample included 20 Class I adult patients treated with Invisalign; they completed their first series of aligners and had to have a “refinement” series. Initial and predicted models were obtained from the initial ClinCheck (Align Technology). The starting point of the refinement ClinCheck was used to create the achieved models. Predicted and achieved models were superimposed over the initial ones on posterior teeth using the 3‐dimensional Image Analysis open‐source software Slicer CMF. Three hundred ninety‐eight teeth were measured for vertical, horizontal, and rotational movements, and transverse widths were measured. The amount of predicted tooth movement was compared with the achieved amount for each movement. Results: Horizontal movements of all incisors seemed to be accurate, with small (0.20–0.25 mm) or insignificant differences between predicted and achieved amounts. Vertical movements and particularly intrusions of maxillary central incisors were found to be less accurate, with a median difference of 1.5 mm (P <0.001). All achieved rotations were significantly smaller than those predicted, with the maxillary canines exhibiting the greatest difference of 3.05° (P <0.001). Conclusions: The most inaccurate movements identified in this study were intrusion of the incisors and rotation of the canines. HIGHLIGHTSDigital models were superimposed to evaluate accuracy of Invisalign tooth movements.Predicted movements were measured on initial vs predicted models (from ClinCheck).Achieved movements were measured on initial vs final models (intraoral scans).No differences were detected between predicted and achieved horizontal movements.The achieved rotations and vertical movements were significantly different than predicted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Efficacy of Invisalign attachments: A retrospective study
Karras, T., Singh, M., Karkazis, E., Liu, D., Nimeri, G., & Ahuja, B. (2021) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.028 · Cited by 95
Clear Aligners: Where are we today? A narrative review
Shashidhar, K., Kanwal, B., Kuttappa, M., Krishna Nayak, U., Shetty, A., & Mathew, K. (2022) · Journal of International Oral Health · doi:10.4103/jioh.jioh_334_21 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Charalampakis, O., Iliadi, A., Ueno, H., Oliver, D. R., & Kim, K. B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-54
- ISSN
- 0889-5406 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2810774801
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of clear aligners: A retrospective study of patients who needed refinement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.028
- The paper
- Charalampakis, O., Iliadi, A., Ueno, H., Oliver, D. R., & Kim, K. B. (2018). Accuracy of clear aligners: A retrospective study of patients who needed refinement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.