The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clear Aligners: Where are we today? A narrative review
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this review article is to discuss the current role of Clear Aligners in treating various malocclusions and the effectiveness of aligners when compared with braces using recent literature. Materials and Methods: Literatures pertaining to production of aligners, efficacy and treatment outcome of aligners, root resorption in aligners, periodontal health during aligner treatment, and comfort levels during aligner treatment were reviewed from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases and included selected systematic reviews. Results: The literature cited during the initial days of aligners showed contrasting results when compared with articles cited recently. It was mainly observed in improvement in the scope of treating various malocclusions. However, the results show that aligners still do not possess the ability to create an extensive range of movements when compared with braces. Conclusion: Despite the claims, evidence for the effectiveness of clear aligners is generally lacking. In mild-to-moderate instances, shorter treatment duration and chair time appear to be the only substantial benefits of transparent aligners over conventional systems supported by current evidence. Advantages of clear aligner therapy were reported for better aesthetics, comfort at an early stage, easier oral hygiene maintenance, and improved periodontal health. Based on the available evidence, clear aligner therapy is definitely effective in managing minor malocclusion and shows acceptable results with moderate malocclusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Lin, F., Yao, L., Bhikoo, C., & Guo, J. (2016) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s113466 · Cited by 14
RetractedEfficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review
Rossini, G., Parrini, S., Castroflorio, T., Deregibus, A., & Debernardi, C. L. (2015) · The Angle Orthodontist · doi:10.2319/061614-436.1 · Cited by 844
Kravitz, N. D., Kusnoto, B., BeGole, E., Obrez, A., & Agran, B. (2009) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.018 · Cited by 703
Djeu, G., Shelton, C., & Maganzini, A. L. (2005) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.002 · Cited by 368
A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies
Ke, Y., Zhu, Y., & Zhu, M. (2019) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-018-0695-z · Cited by 349
The philosophy of the tooth positioning appliance
Kesling, H. D. (1945) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery · doi:10.1016/0096-6347(45)90101-3 · Cited by 316
Accuracy of clear aligners: A retrospective study of patients who needed refinement
Charalampakis, O., Iliadi, A., Ueno, H., Oliver, D. R., & Kim, K. B. (2018) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.028 · Cited by 235
Maxillary molar distalization with aligners in adult patients: a multicenter retrospective study
Ravera, S., Castroflorio, T., Garino, F., Daher, S., Cugliari, G., & Deregibus, A. (2016) · Progress in Orthodontics · doi:10.1186/s40510-016-0126-0 · Cited by 228
Papageorgiou, S. N., Koletsi, D., Iliadi, A., Peltomaki, T., & Eliades, T. (2020) · European Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1093/ejo/cjz094 · Cited by 216
Periodontal health during clear aligners treatment: a systematic review
Rossini, G., Parrini, S., Castroflorio, T., Deregibus, A., & Debernardi, C. L. (2015) · The European Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1093/ejo/cju083 · Cited by 212
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Nahoum HI The vacuum formed dental contour appliance. NY State Dent J 1964;9:385-90.
- McNamara JA, Kramer KL, Juenker JP Invisible retainers. J Clin Orthod 1985;19:570-8.
- Sheridan JJ, LeDoux W, McMinn R Essix retainers: Fabrication and supervision for permanent retention. J Clin Orthod 1993;27:37-45.
- Hilliard K, Sheridan JJ Adjusting Essix appliances at chairside—These simple adjustments can be made in the operatory. J Clin Orthod 2000;34:236-8.
- Li W, Wang S, Zhang Y The effectiveness of the Invisalign appliance in extraction cases using the Abo model grading system: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:8276-82.
- Pavoni C, Lione R, Laganà G, Cozza P Self-ligating versus Invisalign: Analysis of dento-alveolar effects. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2011;2:23-7.
- Castroflorio T, Garino F, Lazzaro A, Debernardi C Upper-incisor root control with Invisalign appliances. J Clin Orthod 2013;47:346-51; quiz 387.
- Anhoury P, Nathanson D, Hughes CV, Socransky S, Feres M, Chou LL Microbial profile on metallic and ceramic bracket materials. Angle Orthod 2002;72:338-43.
- Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO, Bozkurt FY, Yetkin Z, Kaya S, Onal S Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization, and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients. Angle Orthod 2005;75:231-6.
Metadata
- Authors
- Shashidhar, K., Kanwal, B., Kuttappa, M., Krishna Nayak, U., Shetty, A., & Mathew, K.
- Venue
- Journal of International Oral Health
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 222
- ISSN
- 0976-7428
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 49
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clear Aligners: Where are we today? A narrative review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/jioh.jioh_334_21
- The paper
- Shashidhar, K., Kanwal, B., Kuttappa, M., Krishna Nayak, U., Shetty, A., & Mathew, K. (2022). Clear Aligners: Where are we today? A narrative review. Journal of International Oral Health. https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_334_21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.