Cited by 626Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities

Open access
Nicolaides, Kypros H.·2004·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

There is extensive evidence that effective screening for major chromosomal abnormalities can be provided in the first trimester of pregnancy. Prospective studies in a total of 200,868 pregnancies, including 871 fetuses with trisomy 21, have demonstrated that increased nuchal translucency can identify 76.8% of fetuses with trisomy 21, which represents a false-positive rate of 4.2%. When fetal nuchal translucency was combined with maternal serum free-beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in prospective studies in a total of 44,613 pregnancies, including 215 fetuses with trisomy 21, the detection rate was 87.0% for a false-positive rate of 5.0%. Studies from specialist centers with 15,822 pregnancies, which included 397 fetuses with trisomy 21, have demonstrated that the absence of the nasal bone can identify 69.0% of trisomy 21 fetuses, which represents a false-positive rate of 1.4%. It has been estimated that first-trimester screening by a combination of sonography and maternal serum testing can identify 97% of trisomy 21 fetuses, which represents a false-positive rate of 5%, or that the detection rate can be 91%, which represents a false-positive rate of 0.5%. In addition to increased nuchal translucency, important sonographic markers for chromosomal abnormalities, include fetal growth restriction, tachycardia, abnormal flow in the ductus venosus, megacystis, exomphalos and single umbilical artery. Most pregnant women prefer screening in the first, rather than in the second, trimester. As with all aspects of good clinical practice, those care givers who perform first-trimester screening should be trained appropriately, and their results should be subjected to external quality assurance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.090

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The nuchal translucency protocol, in combination with maternal biochemistry, identifies approximately 90% of fetuses with trisomy 21, with a false positive rate of 5%.

    “Of note, this protocol, in combination with maternal biochemistry, identifies approximately 90% of fetuses with trisomy 21, with a false positive rate of 5% [72].”
  • All medical societies referring to the topic (ASUM, AWMF, ISUOG and SOGC) suggest that nuchal translucency evaluation should be performed according to the Fetal Medicine Foundation's protocol.

    “All medical societies referring to the topic (ASUM, AWMF, ISUOG, and SOGC) suggest that its evaluation should be performed according to the Fetal Medicine Foundation’s (FMF’s) protocol [72].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicolaides, K. H.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Nicolaides, Kypros H.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
191
Issue
1
Pages
45-67
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161987212
Cited by
626
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 34
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
nuchal translucency, first-trimester screening, Down syndrome, nasal bone absence, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, PAPP-A, fetal growth restriction, tachycardia, ductus venosus flow, megacystis, omphalocele, single umbilical artery, chromosomal abnormalities, false positive rate, quality assurance
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Maternal Age, Nasal Bone, Neck, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A, Trisomy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length, Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review