Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities
Open accessAbstract
There is extensive evidence that effective screening for major chromosomal abnormalities can be provided in the first trimester of pregnancy. Prospective studies in a total of 200,868 pregnancies, including 871 fetuses with trisomy 21, have demonstrated that increased nuchal translucency can identify 76.8% of fetuses with trisomy 21, which represents a false-positive rate of 4.2%. When fetal nuchal translucency was combined with maternal serum free-beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in prospective studies in a total of 44,613 pregnancies, including 215 fetuses with trisomy 21, the detection rate was 87.0% for a false-positive rate of 5.0%. Studies from specialist centers with 15,822 pregnancies, which included 397 fetuses with trisomy 21, have demonstrated that the absence of the nasal bone can identify 69.0% of trisomy 21 fetuses, which represents a false-positive rate of 1.4%. It has been estimated that first-trimester screening by a combination of sonography and maternal serum testing can identify 97% of trisomy 21 fetuses, which represents a false-positive rate of 5%, or that the detection rate can be 91%, which represents a false-positive rate of 0.5%. In addition to increased nuchal translucency, important sonographic markers for chromosomal abnormalities, include fetal growth restriction, tachycardia, abnormal flow in the ductus venosus, megacystis, exomphalos and single umbilical artery. Most pregnant women prefer screening in the first, rather than in the second, trimester. As with all aspects of good clinical practice, those care givers who perform first-trimester screening should be trained appropriately, and their results should be subjected to external quality assurance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The nuchal translucency protocol, in combination with maternal biochemistry, identifies approximately 90% of fetuses with trisomy 21, with a false positive rate of 5%.
“Of note, this protocol, in combination with maternal biochemistry, identifies approximately 90% of fetuses with trisomy 21, with a false positive rate of 5% [72].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
All medical societies referring to the topic (ASUM, AWMF, ISUOG and SOGC) suggest that nuchal translucency evaluation should be performed according to the Fetal Medicine Foundation's protocol.
“All medical societies referring to the topic (ASUM, AWMF, ISUOG, and SOGC) suggest that its evaluation should be performed according to the Fetal Medicine Foundation’s (FMF’s) protocol [72].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
Cites
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies
Deeks, J., Dinnes, J., D'Amico, R., Sowden, A., Sakarovitch, C., Song, F., Petticrew, M., & Altman, D. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7270 · Cited by 2,907 · see citing works
Snijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6 · Cited by 1,572 · cited 11× · see citing works
“The distribution of measurements from each sonographer and each center is compared with those that were established by a major multicenter study co-ordinated by the FMF.82 The services of the FMF, including certification, software for calculation of risk, and quality assurance are provided free-of charge.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia
Plasencia, W., Maiz, N., Bonino, S., Kaihura, C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5157 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Self-citationRelation between increased fetal nuchal translucency thickness and chromosomal defects
Kagan, K. O., Avgidou, K., Molina, F. S., Gajewska, K., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2006) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000191301.63871.c6 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationWegrzyn, P., Faro, C., Falcon, O., Peralta, C. F. A., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2005) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.1923 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationNie, S., Yu, J., Chen, P., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. Q. (2017) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.08.034 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Automatic Fetal Middle Sagittal Plane Detection in Ultrasound Using Generative Adversarial Network
Tsai, P.-Y., Hung, C.-H., Chen, C.-Y., & Sun, Y.-N. (2020) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics11010021 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“In the first trimester, the MSP has proven to be useful for assessing fetal development and congenital fetal anomalies [1].”
BackgroundFirst-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Nicolaides, K. H.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nicolaides, Kypros H.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 191
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-67
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161987212
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Keywords
- nuchal translucency, first-trimester screening, Down syndrome, nasal bone absence, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, PAPP-A, fetal growth restriction, tachycardia, ductus venosus flow, megacystis, omphalocele, single umbilical artery, chromosomal abnormalities, false positive rate, quality assurance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Maternal Age, Nasal Bone, Neck, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A, Trisomy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length, Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review