Cited by 76Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesClimate Change and Health Impacts

Birth rate and its correlation with the lunar cycle and specific atmospheric conditions

Morton-Pradhan, Susan, Bay, R. Curtis, Coonrod, Dean V.·2005·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective This study was undertaken to use the Arizona State birth certificate database for Phoenix metropolitan hospitals, in conjunction with National Weather Service records to determine whether there is a relationship between birth rate and meteorologic or lunar conditions. This study attempts to dispel or lend significance to beliefs among hospital staff that the phase of the moon and/or meteorologic conditions are related to birth rate.Study design Birth records were limited to spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 37 to 40 weeks' gestation, in Phoenix, between 1995 and 2000 (n = 167,956). Daily birth counts were merged with daily surface weather statistics from the National Weather Service for Sky Harbor Airport, and records of lunar phase for the same period.Results The analyses revealed no significant correlates of birth rate.Conclusion Although there exists a popular belief that the phase of the lunar cycle and weather conditions affect birth rate, no such evidence was found in this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.066

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies from the USA, one from Germany, and one from Brazil showed no lunar influence on hospital admissions for labor.

    “Two studies from the USA [11, 12], one from Germany [16], and one from Brazil [3] showed no lunar influence on hospital admissions for labor.”

    From Lunar Cycle Influences Spontaneous Delivery in Cows (2016) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morton-Pradhan, S., Bay, R. C., & Coonrod, D. V.
Affiliations
  • Maricopa Medical Center (US)
  • Valleywise Health (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
192
Issue
6
Pages
1970-1973
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113305086
Cited by
76
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
Keywords
birth rate, lunar cycle, lunar phases, weather conditions, meteorological factors, normal delivery, term birth, birth timing
MeSH terms
Arizona, Birth Certificates, Birth Rate, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Seasons, Moon, Databases, Factual, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review