CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesGynecological conditions and treatments

Endometriotic umbilical port site metastasis after laparoscopy

Barbaros, Umut, Iyıbozkurt, Ahmet Cem, Gulluoglu, Mıne, Barbaros, Merve, Erbıl, Yesım, Tunalı, Vahıt, Mercan, Selcuk·2005·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.088
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We present the case of a 40-year-old woman who had been previously operated for endometrioma 2 years ago by laparoscopy, with the complaint of an umbilical mass with cyclical pain pattern. The dark-colored mass was excised and pathology report revealed it to be an endometriotic implant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.088

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A trocar port site endometrioma may arise either from peritoneal seeding of cells caused by pneumoperitoneum or from direct contact between the excised lesion and the port tract.

    “A trocar port site endometrioma might develop from the peritoneal seeding of cells because of pneumoperitoneum or from direct contact of the excised lesion with the port tract.5,8”

    From Laparoscopic trocar port site endometriosis: a case report and brief literature review. (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Endometriosis at a trocar port site may develop through peritoneal dissemination of endometrial cells facilitated by pneumoperitoneum or through direct contact of excised lesions with the port tract.

    “Endometriosis at a trocar port site may develop through peritoneal dissemination of endometrial cells facilitated by pneumoperitoneum or through direct contact of excised lesions with the port tract [9].”

    From Umbilical port-site endometriosis: a case presentation and narrative review of the literature (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Barbaros, U., Iyıbozkurt, A. C., Gulluoglu, M., Barbaros, M., Erbıl, Y., Tunalı, V., & Mercan, S.
Affiliations
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR)
Corresponding author
Barbaros, Umut
ORCID
Barbaros, Umut
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
193
Issue
5
Pages
1761-1763
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.088
OpenAlex
W2060289808
Cited by
19
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
endometriosis, laparoscopic surgery complications, endometrioma, umbilical mass, cyclical pain
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Neoplasm Seeding, Laparoscopy, Umbilicus, Endometrial Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review