Cited by 88Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchSexual function and dysfunction studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Seeking healthcare for pelvic floor disorders: a population-based study

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics that are associated with seeking care for pelvic floor disorders (PFD).Study design Strategies for seeking care for pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence (UI), and anal incontinence (AI) were assessed in 4392 women. Women were dichotomized into women who had sought care and women with disorders who had not. Chi-square and t tests were used to compare demographic and medical variables. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI.Results Women who sought care were significantly older (64 +/- 13.1 vs 55 +/- 14.8 years old; P < .001). After an adjustment for significant variables, care-seeking was associated with increasing age per year (prolapse OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.11]; UI OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.05]), hysterectomy (prolapse OR, 4.30 [95% CI, 2.16-8.55]; UI OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.05-1.89]), hormone replacement (UI OR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.29-2.45]), and urinary infections (AI OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.04-2.68]).Conclusion Seeking care for PFD is associated with older age, hysterectomy, hormone use, and frequent urinary tract infection. This reinforces the need for PFD treatment as our population ages and demand increases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.051

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Morrill, M., Lukacz, E. S., Lawrence, J. M., Nager, C. W., Contreras, R., & Luber, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
197
Issue
1
Pages
86.e1-86.e6
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046861672
Cited by
88
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd041113-03)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD041113, R01 HD41113-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
pelvic floor dysfunction, care-seeking behavior, pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, anal incontinence, hysterectomy, hormone replacement therapy, urinary tract infection, age, women's health
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, California, Fecal Incontinence, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Uterine Prolapse, Pelvic Floor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review