The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy
Open accessAbstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to identify risks for mesh/suture erosions following abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC).Study design We analyzed demographic, perioperative variables, and erosion status in 322 participants in the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts study 2 years after sacral colpopexy.Results The predominant graft used was synthetic mesh: woven polyester (Mersilene; Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) (42%) or polypropylene (48%). Twenty subjects (6%) experienced mesh/suture erosion. Unadjusted risk factors for mesh/suture erosion were expanded polytrafluroethylene (ePTFE) mesh (ePTFE 4/21 [19%] vs non-ePTFE 16/301 [5%]; odds ratio [OR], 4.2), concurrent hysterectomy (OR, 4.9), and current smoking (OR, 5.2). Of those with mesh erosion, most affected women (13/17) underwent at least 1 surgery for partial or total mesh removal. Two were completely resolved, 6 had persistent problems, and 5 were lost to follow-up. No resolution was documented in the 4 women who elected observation.Conclusion Expanded PTFE mesh should not be used for sacral colpopexy. Concurrent hysterectomy and smoking are modifiable risks for mesh/suture erosion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the CARE trial, which included 322 women undergoing SC with complete 2-year follow-up, concurrent hysterectomy was associated with a fivefold increase in the risk of mesh/suture erosion compared with those without hysterectomy [8].”
From Mesh Exposure After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Concomitant Total Hysterectomy or Uterine Preservation: A Retrospective Cohort Study (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction
Bump, R. C., Mattiasson, A., Bø, K., Brubaker, L. P., DeLancey, J. O. L., Klarskov, P., Shull, B. L., & Smith, A. R. B. (1996) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0 · Cited by 4,275
Self-citationAbdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Comprehensive Review
Nygaard, I., McCrery, R. J., Brubaker, L. T., Connolly, A., Cundiff, G. W., Weber, A. M., & Zyczynski, H. M. (2004) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000139514.90897.07 · Cited by 911
Self-citationAbdominal Sacrocolpopexy with Burch Colposuspension to Reduce Urinary Stress Incontinence
Brubaker, L. T., Cundiff, G. W., Fine, P. M., Nygaard, I., Richter, H. E., Visco, A. G., Zyczynski, H. M., Brown, M. B., & Weber, A. M. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa054208 · Cited by 510
Self-citationTwo-Year Outcomes After Sacrocolpopexy With and Without Burch to Prevent Stress Urinary Incontinence
Brubaker, L. T., Nygaard, I. E., Richter, H. E., Visco, A. G., Weber, A. M., Cundiff, G. W., Fine, P. M., Ghetti, C. C., & Brown, M. B. (2008) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181778d2a · Cited by 245
Self-citationVaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy
Visco, A. G., Weidner, A. C., Barber, M. D., Myers, E. R., Cundiff, G. W., Bump, R. C., & Addison, W. A. (2001) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2001.109654 · Cited by 240
Self-citationWeinberger, M. M., & Ostergard, D. R. (1995) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0029-7844(95)00098-c · Cited by 112
A randomized trial of colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts (CARE): design and methods
Brubaker, L. T., Cundiff, G. W., Fine, P. M., Nygaard, I., Richter, H. E., Visco, A. G., Zyczynski, H. M., Brown, M. B., & Weber, A. M. (2003) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00073-4 · Cited by 108
Self-citationMesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy
Wu, J. M., Wells, E. C., Hundley, A. F., Connolly, A., Williams, K. S., & Visco, A. G. (2006) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.051 · Cited by 106
Self-citationIncidence and management of abdominal sacrocolpopexy mesh erosions
Begley, J. S., Kupferman, S. P., Kuznetsov, D. D., Kobashi, K. C., Govier, F. E., McGonigle, K. F., & Muntz, H. G. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.062 · Cited by 66
Infected abdominal sacrocolpopexies: diagnosis and treatment
Mattox, T. F., Stanford, E. J., & Varner, E. R. (2003) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-004-1170-8 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–228 of 228
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Patient with Concomitant Pelvic Organ
Mohling, S. I., Furr, R. S., & Liu, C. Y. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_37
Mesh Erosion and Sigmoido-vaginal Fistula
Bajracharya, N., Dangal, G., Karki, A., Pradhan, H. K., Shrestha, R., Bhattachan, K., Paudel, R., Joshi, B. D., & Joshi, A. (2018) · Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.3126/njog.v12i1.18985
Spondylodiszitis nach Sakropexie
Meili, G., Schneider, J., Sigg, M., & Christmann, C. (2018) · Der Gynäkologe · doi:10.1007/s00129-018-4289-2
Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexy—A New Approach in Prolapse Surgery: Preliminary Results
Abolmasov, A. V. (2018) · Journal of Gynecologic Surgery · doi:10.1089/gyn.2018.0026
Laparoscopic Removal of Eroded Sacrocolpopexy Mesh and Fistula Repair 9 Years After Hysterectomy
Fulginiti, A., Peacher, A., & Graebe, R. A. (2021) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000001025
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Khunda, A., Cutner, A. S., & Gynaecologist, C. (2013)
Delayed transrectal mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy
Rengifo, C. E., & Ali, B. (2021) · Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England · doi:10.1308/rcsann.2020.7107
Techniques for Robotic Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
Winn, H. M., Tarr, M. E., & Paraiso, M. F. R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93213-8_17
Techniques in Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
Ferrando, C. A., & Ridgeway, B. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93213-8_8
ABDOMINAL OR VAGINAL ROUTE FOR GENITAL PROLAPSE TREATMENT. ARGUMENTS PRO AND AGAINST THE USE OF MESH
Ionescu, O., Bacalbaşa, N., Saba, N., & Banceanu, G. (2017) · Romanian Medical Journal · doi:10.37897/rmj.2017.4.6
Where Are We Now? Urogynecologic Mesh and Present Recommendations
Gee, A. D., Chapman, G. C., & Paraiso, M. F. R. (2022) · Journal of Gynecologic Surgery · doi:10.1089/gyn.2022.0051
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with Autologous Fascia Lata
Hennes, D. M. Z. B., Buckley, V., & Rosamilia, A. (2024) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-024-06010-z
Yu, B., Yang, J., Nie, Q., Zhang, K., Han, J., & Wang, Y. (2024) · BMC Surgery · doi:10.1186/s12893-024-02742-3
The Problem of Recurrent Anterior Wall Prolapse after Supracervical Hysterectomy with Sacrocolpopexy
Haraki, A. S. E., Plair, A. R., & Matthews, C. A. (2025) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-025-06134-w
Carracedo, D., Moscatiello, P., Hernández, I., Jerez, T., García-Ibarrola, C. G., Toledo, M., & Encinas, M. S. (2025) · Actas Urológicas Españolas · doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2025.501866
Advances in Surgical Treatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
陈, 星. (2025) · Advances in Clinical Medicine · doi:10.12677/acm.2025.1592690
Carracedo, D., Moscatiello, P., Hernández, I., Jerez, T., García-Ibarrola, C. G., Toledo, M., & Encinas, M. S. (2025) · Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501866
Robotic/Laparoscopic Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
Schwartz, D. J., Stewart, L. E., Pape, D. M., & Rosenblum, N. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00339-3_11
NEZHAT, C. R., Nezhat, F. R., NEZHAT, C. R., Lakhi, N. A., & Nezhat, A. A. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108561440.018
Robotic Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy
McAchran, S. E., & Moore, C. K. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1317-6_9
Burger, K. A., Bastawros, D. A., & Kennelly, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00339-3_20
Husby, K. R., Eisenhardt, M. F., Bergholt, T., Gradel, K. O., & Klarskov, N. (2025) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-025-06487-2
Öz, Ö. F., & Dinç, C. (2026) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-026-06671-y
Ota, K., Ota, Y., Tasaka, K., Shiota, M., & Shimoya, K. (2026) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-026-06638-z · Cited by 1
Quy, P. T., Lacorre, A., Mathonnet, M., Descazeaud, A., & Gauthier, T. (2026) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2026.103233
Cirugía abdominal, laparoscópica y robótica para el prolapso de los órganos pélvicos
McDermott, C. D., & Hale, D. S. (2009) · Clínicas obstétricas y ginecológicas de Norteamérica
Metadata
- Authors
- Cundiff, G. W., Varner, E., Visco, A. G., Zyczynski, H. M., Nager, C. W., Norton, P. A., Schaffer, J., Brown, M. B., & Brubaker, L.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 688.e1-688.e5
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2859033
- OpenAlex
- W2034559943
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK060380)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10HD041268, U10HD041261, U01HD041249, U10HD041263, U10HD041267, U10HD041248, U10HD041269, U10HD041250, UG1HD041267)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Keywords
- sacrocolpopexy, mesh erosion, suture erosion, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh, risk factors, smoking, mesh removal, pelvic organ prolapse surgery
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Colposcopy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Reoperation, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Surgical Mesh, Sutures, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Uterine Prolapse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review