The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disparities in family planning
Open accessAbstract
Prominent racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy, abortion, and unintended births exist in the United States. These disparities can contribute to the cycle of disadvantage experienced by specific demographic groups when women are unable to control their fertility as desired. In this review we consider three factors which contribute to disparities in family planning outcomes: patient preferences and behaviors, health care system factors, and provider related factors. Through addressing barriers to access to family planning services, including abortion and contraception, and working to ensure that all women receive patient-centered reproductive health care, health care providers and policy makers can substantially improve the ability of women from all racial/ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds to make informed decisions about their fertility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-5843 · Cited by 7,043
Capps, L. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.18.2487-b · Cited by 4,526
The Effect of Race and Sex on Physicians' Recommendations for Cardiac Catheterization
Schulman, K. A., Berlin, J. A., Harless, W., Kerner, J. F., Sistrunk, S., Gersh, B. J., Dubé, R., Taleghani, C. K., Burke, J. E., Williams, S., et al. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199902253400806 · Cited by 1,934
Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3809006 · Cited by 1,557
The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients
van Ryn, M., & Burke, J. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00338-x · Cited by 1,509
Births: preliminary data for 2012.
Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2013) · PubMed · Cited by 1,509
Gipson, J. D., Koenig, M. A., & Hindin, M. J. (2008) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2008.00148.x · Cited by 994
Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a large population based retrospective cohort study.
Chen, X.-K., Wen, S. W., Fleming, N., Demissie, K., Rhoads, G. G., & Walker, M. (2007) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyl284 · Cited by 971
Patient Race/Ethnicity and Quality of Patient–Physician Communication During Medical Visits
Johnson, R. L., Roter, D., Powe, N. R., & Cooper, L. A. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.12.2084 · Cited by 955
Hogan, D. P., & Kitagawa, E. M. (1985) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228146 · Cited by 767
Cited by
A blessing I can't afford: Factors underlying the paradox of happiness about unintended pregnancy
Aiken, A. R. A., Dillaway, C., & Mevs-Korff, N. (2015) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.038 · Cited by 138
Cheslack Postava, K., & Winter, A. S. (2015) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/47e2615 · Cited by 57
Trends and inequalities in modern contraceptive use among women in Sierra Leone, 2008–2019
Osborne, A., Bangura, C., & Ahinkorah, B. O. (2024) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/s12978-024-01900-3 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Dehlendorf, C., Rodriguez, M. I., Levy, K., Borrero, S., & Steinauer, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 214-220
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076551291
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disparities in family planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022
- The paper
- Dehlendorf, C., Rodriguez, M. I., Levy, K., Borrero, S., & Steinauer, J. (2010). Disparities in family planning. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
