Cited by 1,557Reproductive Health and ContraceptionAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthReproductive Health and Technologies

Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001

Finer, Lawrence B., Henshaw, Stanley K.·2006·Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Abstract

CONTEXT: Many pregnancies are unintended, particularly in certain population groups. Determining whether unintended pregnancy rates and disparities in rates between subgroups are changing may help policymakers target reproductive health services to those women most in need. METHODS: To calculate rates of unintended pregnancy and related outcomes, data on pregnancy intendedness from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth were combined with birth, abortion and population data from federal, state and nongovernmental sources. RESULTS: In 2001, 49% of pregnancies in the United States were unintended. The unintended pregnancy rate was 51 per 1,000 women aged 15–44, meaning that 5% of this group had an unintended pregnancy. This level was unchanged from 1994. The rate of unintended pregnancy in 2001 was substantially above average among women aged 18–24, unmarried (particularly cohabiting) women, low‐income women, women who had not completed high school and minority women. Between 1994 and 2001, the rate of unintended pregnancy declined among adolescents, college graduates and the wealthiest women, but increased among poor and less educated women. The abortion rate and the proportion of unintended pregnancies ending in abortion among all women declined, while the unintended birth rate increased. Forty‐eight percent of unintended conceptions in 2001 occurred during a month when contraceptives were used, compared with 51% in 1994. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to determine the factors underlying the disparities in unintended pregnancy rates by income and other characteristics. The findings may reflect a need for increased and more effective contraceptive use, particularly among high‐risk groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1363/3809006

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K.
Affiliations
Guttmacher Institute (US)
Venue
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Published
2006-06
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
90-96
ISSN
  • 1538-6341 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-2393
OpenAlex
W4232664472
Cited by
1,557
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 116 · 2012: 178
FWCI
100.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
unintended pregnancy, health disparities, contraceptive use, abortion, low-income women, educational attainment, minority women, adolescent pregnancy, reproductive health services, National Survey of Family Growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review